Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update Rubocop #275

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 3, 2017
Merged

Update Rubocop #275

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 3, 2017

Conversation

petems
Copy link
Owner

@petems petems commented Jul 3, 2017

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 98.006% when pulling 830f667 on update_rubocop into b11e68f on master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 98.006% when pulling 830f667 on update_rubocop into b11e68f on master.

@petems petems force-pushed the update_rubocop branch 2 times, most recently from 2286f1f to 6db0e4a Compare July 3, 2017 15:22
@petems
Update Rubocop
173b7ae 
* Fixes #271
* Updates test matrix with new rubies and remove 2.0.0 support
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 3, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.003%) to 98.009% when pulling 6db0e4a on update_rubocop into 3c3705a on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 3, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.003%) to 98.009% when pulling 173b7ae on update_rubocop into 3c3705a on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 3, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.003%) to 98.009% when pulling 173b7ae on update_rubocop into 3c3705a on master.

@petems petems merged commit 1d93691 into master Jul 3, 2017
@petems petems deleted the update_rubocop branch November 18, 2017 14:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@petems @coveralls