Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[docqueries][tsp] removing randomize parameter from calls #2234

Merged

Conversation

cvvergara
Copy link
Member

pgr_TSP & pgr_TSPeuclidean are not using simulated annealing anymore and randomize parameter is ignored and will be removed on version 4.0, from the documentation queries example this PR is removing the randomize parameter.
Also adding space after a comma
@pgRouting/admins

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ SET
SELECT version, library FROM pgr_full_version();
version | library
-----------+-----------------
3.4.0-dev | pgrouting-3.4.0
4.0.0-dev | pgrouting-4.0.0
Copy link
Member

@krashish8 krashish8 Jan 5, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the develop branch shall remain at v3.4.0

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah, that is why reviews are needed. one it

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ SET
SELECT pgr_version();
pgr_version
-------------
3.4.0-dev
4.0.0-dev
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same as above

@cvvergara cvvergara merged commit 409c9e8 into pgRouting:develop Jan 5, 2022
@cvvergara cvvergara deleted the tsp-docqueries-remove-randomize branch January 5, 2022 17:02
cvvergara added a commit to cvvergara/pgrouting that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2022
cvvergara added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2022
* removing `randomize` parameter from calls
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants