-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix nightly-release workflow and tweak Poetry package naming #208
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -22,8 +22,11 @@ exclude = ''' | |
''' | ||
|
||
[tool.poetry] | ||
name = "pinecone" | ||
name = "pinecone-client" | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Interesting. I went back and forth on this name value in my original Poetry PR from |
||
version = "2.2.4" | ||
packages = [ | ||
{ include="pinecone", from="." }, | ||
] | ||
Comment on lines
+27
to
+29
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Read up on this and it makes sense to me. |
||
description = "Pinecone client and SDK" | ||
authors = ["Pinecone Systems, Inc. <[email protected]>"] | ||
license = "Apache-2.0" | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This all looks reasonable to me. I was trying to think of some edge cases where it would be possible to perform a partial or incomplete version bump, but theoretically if any of these subcommand were to fail, the step itself would fail and then the GitHub Action job would fail.