*: not send tso request when point get with max tso

[crazycs520]

What problem does this PR solve?

Point get without double read will use maxUint64 as transaction tso. Then no need to send tso request to PD.

This PR will delay to get txn future after try fast point, so it may have a little performance regression in the case of need to get tso from PD. Especially in the situation of point get with double read.

BenchMark

Environment: In my local machine: 1 TiDB, 1 PD, 5 TiKV.

Best case: Point get with max tso

Before

• point get QPS is 25.7k

This PR

• point get QPS is 31.4k

Worst case: Point get with double read can't use max tso

Before

• point get with double read QPS is 17.8k

In this PR

• point get with double read QPS is 17.1k

As you can see, since I delay use get txn future, there is a performance regression is this situation.

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

• No test.

Code changes

• Has exported function/method change

[crazycs520]

/run-all-tests

[crazycs520]

/bench

[crazycs520]

@tiancaiamao @coocood @jackysp PTAL

[jackysp]

I think @cfzjywxk is doing something similar. I have tried it before. I think if you want to change the getting ts, it's best to make the prepare statement stop executing subqueries first.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #11981 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             master     #11981   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage   81.3309%   81.3309%           
===========================================
  Files           445        445           
  Lines         95468      95468           
===========================================
  Hits          77645      77645           
  Misses        12293      12293           
  Partials       5530       5530

[mahjonp]

@crazycs520 I had adjusted some configurations yesterday afternoon, so there existed an error in the benchmark result.

[crazycs520]

/bench

[sre-bot]

@@                               Benchmark Diff                               @@
================================================================================
--- tidb: 728ed194c0669cb4effe6398de464c3ffbfb6608
+++ tidb: 46acbe07df9016a0fce3c5562e85ea60601df975
tikv: af70f367a38aad3305e32d8de17f60e09ea87fc3
pd: a1f8d9db4ac3e713c3259ca0979312fe3b61adac
================================================================================
test-1: < oltp_insert >
    * QPS : 21601.36 ± 0.2608% (std=40.10) delta: -0.15%
    * AvgMs : 11.84 ± 0.2744% (std=0.02) delta: 0.14%
    * PercentileMs99 : 42.31 ± 2.5526% (std=0.62) delta: 0.01%
            
test-2: < oltp_update_non_index >
    * QPS : 29636.88 ± 0.4531% (std=97.59) delta: -0.21%
    * AvgMs : 8.63 ± 0.4170% (std=0.03) delta: 0.19%
    * PercentileMs99 : 30.59 ± 1.0788% (std=0.27) delta: 1.09%
            
test-3: < oltp_read_write >
    * QPS : 37093.30 ± 0.2842% (std=71.10) delta: 0.00%
    * AvgMs : 138.57 ± 0.2656% (std=0.26) delta: -0.02%
    * PercentileMs99 : 257.95 ± 0.0000% (std=0.00) delta: 0.00%
            
test-4: < oltp_point_select >
    * QPS : 75141.81 ± 1.3490% (std=583.43) delta: -0.09%
    * AvgMs : 3.41 ± 1.2918% (std=0.03) delta: 0.18%
    * PercentileMs99 : 7.43 ± 0.0000% (std=0.00) delta: 0.00%
            
test-5: < oltp_update_index >
    * QPS : 17104.94 ± 0.8327% (std=86.63) delta: -0.20%
    * AvgMs : 14.96 ± 0.8420% (std=0.08) delta: 0.21%
    * PercentileMs99 : 48.17 ± 2.1675% (std=0.65) delta: 1.47%
            

https://perf.pingcap.com

[sre-bot]

@@                               Benchmark Diff                               @@
================================================================================
--- tidb: 994e14e2e71ba16085c4e24d09d708a282beac18
+++ tidb: 7a0c170583f159d35143909851de4dee2cfc70d3
tikv: 6c420ba38cc0389c3cf21d4c5b5731ad110e6873
pd: 7baffcba6ae610f79854638aba50cd5feff9761f
================================================================================
test-1: < oltp_insert >
    * QPS : 21513.23 ± 0.1662% (std=20.90) delta: 0.02%
    * AvgMs : 11.89 ± 0.1472% (std=0.01) delta: -0.03%
    * PercentileMs99 : 42.61 ± 0.0000% (std=0.00) delta: 0.72%
            
test-2: < oltp_update_non_index >
    * QPS : 29595.16 ± 0.1788% (std=35.26) delta: -0.07%
    * AvgMs : 8.65 ± 0.1851% (std=0.01) delta: 0.01%
    * PercentileMs99 : 30.70 ± 2.1758% (std=0.41) delta: -0.35%
            
test-3: < oltp_read_write >
    * QPS : 36965.12 ± 0.3901% (std=86.92) delta: -0.18%
    * AvgMs : 139.05 ± 0.3912% (std=0.32) delta: 0.17%
    * PercentileMs99 : 257.95 ± 0.0000% (std=0.00) delta: 0.00%
            
test-4: < oltp_point_select >
    * QPS : 75528.47 ± 1.3784% (std=655.96) delta: 0.12%
    * AvgMs : 3.39 ± 1.5348% (std=0.03) delta: -0.06%
    * PercentileMs99 : 7.43 ± 0.0000% (std=0.00) delta: 0.70%
            
test-5: < oltp_update_index >
    * QPS : 17167.72 ± 0.4366% (std=56.26) delta: 0.52%
    * AvgMs : 14.91 ± 0.4191% (std=0.05) delta: -0.50%
    * PercentileMs99 : 47.99 ± 2.5379% (std=0.70) delta: -0.36%
            

https://perf.pingcap.com

[lysu]

/run-cherry-picker

[lysu]

/run-cherry-picker

[sre-bot]

cherry pick to release-2.1 in PR #16334

[sre-bot]

cherry pick to release-3.0 in PR #16335

[sre-bot]

cherry pick to release-3.1 in PR #16336