-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
expression: implement vectorized evaluation for builtinJSONContainsPathSig
#13956
Conversation
Thanks for your contribution. If your PR get merged, you will be rewarded 50 points. |
Test failed. [2019-12-16T11:09:16.926Z] FAIL: integration_test.go:3900: testIntegrationSuite.TestFuncJSON
[2019-12-16T11:09:16.926Z]
[2019-12-16T11:09:16.926Z] integration_test.go:4022:
[2019-12-16T11:09:16.926Z] r = tk.MustQuery(`select
[2019-12-16T11:09:16.926Z] json_contains_path(NULL, 'one', "$.c"),
[2019-12-16T11:09:16.926Z] json_contains_path(NULL, 'all', "$.c"),
[2019-12-16T11:09:16.926Z] json_contains_path('{"a": 1}', NULL, "$.c"),
[2019-12-16T11:09:16.926Z] json_contains_path('{"a": 1}', 'one', NULL),
[2019-12-16T11:09:16.926Z] json_contains_path('{"a": 1}', 'all', NULL)
[2019-12-16T11:09:16.926Z] `) |
a5149e1
to
0fd3f29
Compare
All problems result in test failed fixed, PTAL @XuHuaiyu |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for my late reply, LGTM
/run-all-tests |
@chenlx0 Friendly ping, please address comments. |
@chenlx0, please update your pull request. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
/run-all-tests |
PCP #12103
What problem does this PR solve?
implement vectorized evaluation for
builtinJSONContainsPathSig
What is changed and how it works?
About 5% faster.
Check List
Tests