Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

functions: fix some string function has wrong collation and flag #23835

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 7, 2021

Conversation

xiongjiwei
Copy link
Contributor

@xiongjiwei xiongjiwei commented Apr 2, 2021

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #23759

some string functions get the wrong binary flag result, the returned value has a binary flag only its return value is binary charset

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test

Release note

  • fix some string function get wrong result

@xiongjiwei xiongjiwei requested a review from a team as a code owner April 2, 2021 08:15
@xiongjiwei xiongjiwei requested review from qw4990 and removed request for a team April 2, 2021 08:15
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 2, 2021
@xiongjiwei xiongjiwei marked this pull request as draft April 2, 2021 14:54
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 2, 2021
@xiongjiwei xiongjiwei marked this pull request as ready for review April 3, 2021 05:48
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 3, 2021
@wjhuang2016
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Apr 6, 2021
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • wjhuang2016
  • wshwsh12

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by writing /lgtm in a comment.
Reviewer can cancel approval by writing /lgtm cancel in a comment.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Apr 7, 2021
@xiongjiwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 89e5d28

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Apr 7, 2021
@xiongjiwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-unit-test

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 7229416 into pingcap:master Apr 7, 2021
ti-srebot pushed a commit to ti-srebot/tidb that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2021
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick to release-4.0 in PR #23878

ti-srebot pushed a commit to ti-srebot/tidb that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2021
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick to release-5.0 in PR #23879

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component/expression needs-cherry-pick-release-5.0 size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. type/bugfix This PR fixes a bug.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

collation and flag of some functions are wrong
5 participants