Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dml : cache table reads data from the original table in a new transaction #29575

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 9, 2021

Conversation

JayLZhou
Copy link
Contributor

@JayLZhou JayLZhou commented Nov 8, 2021

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Problem Summary:
this is a subTask of #25293

What is changed and how it works?

This question is mentioned in this pr #29444
The Cache table should reads data from the original table in a new transaction.
Change UpdateLockForRead(ctx sessionctx.Context, ts uint64) to UpdateLockForRead(store kv.Storage, ts uint64) to avoid misuse for sessionctx.Context that can cause data race.

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Release note

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Nov 8, 2021

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • lcwangchao
  • tiancaiamao

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 8, 2021
go func() {
tk2.MustExec("begin")
tk2.MustQuery("select *from complex_cache where id > 7").Check(testkit.Rows("9 109 1009"))
tk2.HasPlan("select *from complex_cache where id > 7", "UnionScan")
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Loading cache is async, will it make the test unstable?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you are right.

@JayLZhou
Copy link
Contributor Author

JayLZhou commented Nov 9, 2021

TestDropPrimaryKey is unstable test.

@JayLZhou
Copy link
Contributor Author

JayLZhou commented Nov 9, 2021

/run-check_dev_2

@JayLZhou
Copy link
Contributor Author

JayLZhou commented Nov 9, 2021

/cc @lcwangchao @tiancaiamao

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Nov 9, 2021
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond)
if tk2.HasPlan("select *from complex_cache where id > 7", "UnionScan") {
break
}
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fail if still can't get the plan after several retries.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

okay

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Nov 9, 2021
@tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: fd1d069

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Nov 9, 2021
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@jayl-zxl: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

At the same time I will also trigger all tests for you:

/run-all-tests

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit bbea5a7 into pingcap:master Nov 9, 2021
@tiancaiamao tiancaiamao mentioned this pull request Nov 15, 2021
32 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants