Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

*: revert "reduce object allocation by reuse chunk column" #29064 #29580

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 9, 2021

Conversation

tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Revert PR for case #29554 on the 5.3 branch

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Revert chunk column reuse because of bugs

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Nov 8, 2021

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • guo-shaoge
  • winoros

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 8, 2021
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Nov 8, 2021
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Nov 8, 2021
@tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-check_dev

@xhebox
Copy link
Contributor

xhebox commented Nov 9, 2021

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: ffa5314

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Nov 9, 2021
@VelocityLight VelocityLight added the cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. label Nov 9, 2021
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@tiancaiamao: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

At the same time I will also trigger all tests for you:

/run-all-tests

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 8972f2f into pingcap:release-5.3 Nov 9, 2021
@tiancaiamao tiancaiamao deleted the revert-chunk-reuse branch November 15, 2021 11:32
@xhebox xhebox mentioned this pull request Nov 30, 2021
3 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants