Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

executor: improve the way of getting table_id in the TestTiDBHotRegionsHistory #33328

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 23, 2022
Merged

executor: improve the way of getting table_id in the TestTiDBHotRegionsHistory #33328

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 23, 2022

Conversation

hawkingrei
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: Weizhen Wang [email protected]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #33327

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Mar 22, 2022 •
edited
Loading

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • wjhuang2016
  • wshwsh12

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 22, 2022
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Mar 22, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Code Coverage Details: https://codecov.io/github/pingcap/tidb/commit/2e09ec2d2c0eb2f5df52810cd32dc7710f2b7df4

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 23, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Mar 23, 2022
@hawkingrei
Copy link
Member Author

/run-build

@hawkingrei
Copy link
Member Author

/run-unit-test

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Mar 23, 2022
@wjhuang2016
Copy link
Member

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: ccea224

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Mar 23, 2022
@hawkingrei
Copy link
Member Author

/run-unit-test

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 2d3e469 into pingcap:master Mar 23, 2022
@hawkingrei hawkingrei deleted the status branch March 23, 2022 04:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@wshwsh12 wshwsh12 wshwsh12 approved these changes

@wjhuang2016 wjhuang2016 wjhuang2016 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

improve the way of getting table_id in the TestTiDBHotRegionsHistory
5 participants
@hawkingrei @ti-chi-bot @sre-bot @wjhuang2016 @wshwsh12