Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

br: fix compatibility issue with concurrent ddl #36474

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jul 23, 2022

Conversation

3pointer
Copy link
Contributor

@3pointer 3pointer commented Jul 22, 2022

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #36453

Problem Summary:
After concurrent DDL feature implemented. v6.2 cluster will use a new way(ddl table) to execute ddls. but when using v6.2 br to restore cluster to v6.1 doesn't have such ddl tables.

What is changed and how it works?

This PR add a check. when using br (> v6.2) restore cluster (< v6.1). br will disable the switch of concurrent ddl.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)

截屏2022-07-22 下午4 07 08

  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Jul 22, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • D3Hunter
  • wjhuang2016

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 22, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. do-not-merge/needs-triage-completed needs-cherry-pick-6.2 and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue do-not-merge/needs-triage-completed labels Jul 22, 2022
@3pointer 3pointer marked this pull request as ready for review July 22, 2022 08:16
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 22, 2022
// CheckVersionForDDL checks whether we use queue or table to execute ddl during restore.
func CheckVersionForDDL(s *metapb.Store, tikvVersion *semver.Version) error {
// use tikvVersion instead of tidbVersion since br doesn't have mysql client to connect tidb.
if tikvVersion.Major < 6 || (tikvVersion.Major == 6 && tikvVersion.Minor <= 1) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can use compare method

// use tikvVersion instead of tidbVersion since br doesn't have mysql client to connect tidb.
if tikvVersion.Major < 6 || (tikvVersion.Major == 6 && tikvVersion.Minor <= 1) {
log.Info("detected the old version of tidb cluster. set enable concurrent ddl to false")
variable.EnableConcurrentDDL.Store(false)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no need to set it back?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@3pointer 3pointer Jul 22, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, this variable only works for br when br exists.

Copy link
Contributor

@D3Hunter D3Hunter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Jul 22, 2022
@3pointer
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 22, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Jul 22, 2022
@3pointer
Copy link
Contributor Author

/unhold

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 22, 2022
@3pointer
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-check_dev_2

@3pointer
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-mysql-test

@3pointer
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-unit-test

@3pointer 3pointer force-pushed the fix_compatibility_issue_with_ddl branch from 3532d7f to 175fd85 Compare July 22, 2022 10:09
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the needs-cherry-pick-release-6.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.1 branch. label Jul 22, 2022
@3pointer
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-unit-tests

@3pointer 3pointer force-pushed the fix_compatibility_issue_with_ddl branch from 81da308 to 5c30510 Compare July 23, 2022 06:05
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Jul 23, 2022

@wjhuang2016 wjhuang2016 removed the needs-cherry-pick-release-6.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.1 branch. label Jul 23, 2022
@3pointer
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-integration-br-tests

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the needs-cherry-pick-release-6.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.1 branch. label Jul 23, 2022
@3pointer
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-integration-br-tests

@3pointer
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 20393e2

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Jul 23, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 28a8ffc into pingcap:master Jul 23, 2022
ti-srebot pushed a commit to ti-srebot/tidb that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2022
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick to release-6.1 in PR #36488

ti-srebot pushed a commit to ti-srebot/tidb that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2022
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick to release-6.2 in PR #36489

@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Jul 23, 2022

TiDB MergeCI notify

🔴 Bad News! New failing [1] after this pr merged.
These new failed integration tests seem to be caused by the current PR, please try to fix these new failed integration tests, thanks!

CI Name Result Duration Compare with Parent commit
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-common-test 🟥 failed 1, success 10, total 11 1 hr 3 min New failing
idc-jenkins-ci/integration-cdc-test 🟢 all 36 tests passed 25 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/common-test 🟢 all 12 tests passed 17 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-1 🟢 all 26 tests passed 7 min 46 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/tics-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 7 min 26 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-ddl-test 🟢 all 6 tests passed 6 min 47 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-2 🟢 all 28 tests passed 5 min 38 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mybatis-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 3 min 36 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-compatibility-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 2 min 48 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/plugin-test 🟢 build success, plugin test success 4min Existing passed

joycse06 added a commit to joycse06/tidb that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2022
…rimary-key

* upstream/master: (104 commits)
  br: fix compatibility issue with concurrent ddl (pingcap#36474)
  infoschema: fix PromQL for `tidb_distsql_copr_cache` (pingcap#36450)
  test: stabilize TestTopSQLCPUProfile (pingcap#36468)
  parser: add support of 'ADMIN SHOW DDL JOB QUERIES LIMIT m OFFSET n' transferring to AST (pingcap#36285)
  *: enable flaky test for all test (pingcap#36385)
  expression: fix return type of agg func `bit_or` when handling varbinary column (pingcap#36415)
  executor: fix aggregating enum zero value gets different results from mysql  (pingcap#36208)
  server: skip check tiflash version (pingcap#36451)
  *: Minor update to SECURITY.md to improved clarity (pingcap#36346)
  table partition: add telemetry for partition table (pingcap#36204)
  ddl: invalid multiple MAXVALUE partitions (pingcap#36329) (pingcap#36345)
  planner: Fixed `Merge` hint in nested CTE (pingcap#36432)
  metric: impove concurrency ddl metrics (pingcap#36405)
  planner: add more test cases for leading outer join (pingcap#36409)
  ddl: only set concurrent variable if no error (pingcap#36437)
  ddl: fix update panic in the middle of multi-schema change (pingcap#36421)
  session: Mising OptimizeWithPlanAndThenWarmUp in prepare-execute path (pingcap#36347)
  executor,metrics: add a metric for observing execution phases (pingcap#35906)
  br: unified docker image align with tidb (pingcap#36016)
  ddl: skip to close nil sessPool  (pingcap#36425)
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-cherry-pick-release-6.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.1 branch. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Br:6.2 restore to tidb:6.1 failed due to Error: [schema:1146]Table 'mysql.tidb_ddl_job' doesn't exist
7 participants