executor: add cache padding for lock of RowContainer

[gengliqi]

Signed-off-by: gengliqi [email protected]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #37641

Problem Summary:
As #37641 said, there are false sharing issue and true sharing issue of lock of RowContainer.
For the false sharing issue, this PR adds a cache padding for lock of RowContainer.
For the true sharing issue, this PR makes different workers use the different rlock.

Although the issue said we should find a more elegant method to solve this issue, @Yui-Song told me that the result of a certain test has a very unstable time which causes some warning reports. So it's better to solve this issue immediately.

We'll leave the reconstruction work to finish later.

Performance test by the complex query mentioned in #37641.

Master	This PR
409.6s	190.4s
479.0s	189.9s
384.9s	189.7s

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No code

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

Improve the performance of hash join in TiDB

[ti-chi-bot]

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

• XuHuaiyu
• wshwsh12

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

[gengliqi]

/run-build-arm64 comment=true

[sre-bot]

download tidb binary(linux arm64) at http://fileserver.pingcap.net/download/builds/pingcap/test/tidb/506f1b659c20478053df43eab537df60472553e4/centos7/tidb-linux-arm64.tar.gz

[gengliqi]

/cc @XuHuaiyu @wshwsh12

[gengliqi]

/run-build-arm64 comment=true

[sre-bot]

download tidb binary(linux arm64) at http://fileserver.pingcap.net/download/builds/pingcap/test/tidb/1f1f0e1c853f10a1c07b9c4463fea8b5fe9b8f62/centos7/tidb-linux-arm64.tar.gz

[gengliqi]

/run-build-arm64 comment=true

[sre-bot]

download tidb binary(linux arm64) at http://fileserver.pingcap.net/download/builds/pingcap/test/tidb/3d3acbe57d538f2aa4668b22ad0f3b5f016e034c/centos7/tidb-linux-arm64.tar.gz

[dbsid]

/run-build comment=true

[XuHuaiyu]

/merge

[ti-chi-bot]

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: e003638

[sre-bot]

TiDB MergeCI notify

🔴 Bad News! [2] CI still failing after this pr merged.
These failed integration tests don't seem to be introduced by the current PR.

CI Name	Result	Duration	Compare with Parent commit
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-common-test	🔴 failed 1, success 16, total 17	21 min	Existing failure
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/common-test	🔴 failed 1, success 10, total 11	15 min	Existing failure
idc-jenkins-ci/integration-cdc-test	🟢 all 37 tests passed	28 min	Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/tics-test	🟢 all 1 tests passed	8 min 53 sec	Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-ddl-test	🟢 all 6 tests passed	8 min 29 sec	Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-2	🟢 all 28 tests passed	8 min 20 sec	Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-1	🟢 all 26 tests passed	8 min 16 sec	Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mybatis-test	🟢 all 1 tests passed	3 min 43 sec	Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-compatibility-test	🟢 all 1 tests passed	3 min 9 sec	Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/plugin-test	🟢 build success, plugin test success	4min	Existing passed