Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

*: support foreign key on update cascade and set null when execute update statement #38652

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Nov 1, 2022

Conversation

crazycs520
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #38651

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Oct 26, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • ekexium
  • you06

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 26, 2022
@crazycs520
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 29, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 31, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Oct 31, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@ekexium ekexium left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suggest adding some comments explaning how it works. It's not so obvious at first sight.

Are there still any difficulties stopping us from building the AST instead of manipulating SQLs? I'm somewhat worried datum -> string(sql) -> datum may not be identical(?)

@@ -735,6 +824,8 @@ func genFKValueString(v types.Datum) (string, error) {
switch v.Kind() {
case types.KindInt64, types.KindUint64, types.KindFloat32, types.KindFloat64, types.KindMysqlDecimal:
return val, nil
case types.KindNull:
return "NULL", err
default:
return "'" + val + "'", nil
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do all remaining types work well with '?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice catch, I just add all types test in mysql_test/t/foreign_key_cascade_type.test https://github.com/pingcap/tidb-test/pull/2000.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Oct 31, 2022
Signed-off-by: crazycs520 <[email protected]>
@crazycs520
Copy link
Contributor Author

I suggest adding some comments explaning how it works. It's not so obvious at first sight.

Are there still any difficulties stopping us from building the AST instead of manipulating SQLs? I'm somewhat worried datum -> string(sql) -> datum may not be identical(?)

I'll try this later.

@crazycs520
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 9289c43

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Nov 1, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Nov 1, 2022
@crazycs520
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 9549cf0

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Nov 1, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 38e9aa0 into pingcap:master Nov 1, 2022
@crazycs520 crazycs520 deleted the fk-on-update branch November 1, 2022 05:17
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Nov 1, 2022

TiDB MergeCI notify

✅ Well Done! New fixed [3] after this pr merged.

CI Name Result Duration Compare with Parent commit
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-ddl-test ✅ all 6 tests passed 29 min Fixed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-common-test ✅ all 17 tests passed 14 min Fixed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/common-test ✅ all 11 tests passed 8 min 59 sec Fixed
idc-jenkins-ci/integration-cdc-test 🟢 all 38 tests passed 21 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-2 🟢 all 28 tests passed 7 min 57 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/tics-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 6 min 27 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-1 🟢 all 26 tests passed 4 min 17 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mybatis-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 3 min 8 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-compatibility-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 2 min 59 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/plugin-test 🟢 build success, plugin test success 4min Existing passed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

support foreign key on update cascade and set null
5 participants