Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

domain: support plan replayer dump workers running in concurrency #39347

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Dec 7, 2022

Conversation

Yisaer
Copy link
Contributor

@Yisaer Yisaer commented Nov 23, 2022

Signed-off-by: yisaer [email protected]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: ref #38779

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

support plan replayer dump workers running in concurrency

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)

https://pingcap.feishu.cn/docx/Ak9WdC71No5PybxifvocUK59nRX?from=from_lark_index_search

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

Signed-off-by: yisaer <[email protected]>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Nov 23, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • qw4990
  • xuyifangreeneyes

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 23, 2022
Signed-off-by: yisaer <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: yisaer <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: yisaer <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: yisaer <[email protected]>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 24, 2022
Signed-off-by: yisaer <[email protected]>
@Yisaer Yisaer marked this pull request as ready for review November 24, 2022 06:44
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 24, 2022
Signed-off-by: yisaer <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: yisaer <[email protected]>
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Nov 28, 2022

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

StatsLoadConcurrency uint `toml:"stats-load-concurrency" json:"stats-load-concurrency"`
StatsLoadQueueSize uint `toml:"stats-load-queue-size" json:"stats-load-queue-size"`
AnalyzePartitionConcurrencyQuota uint `toml:"analyze-partition-concurrency-quota" json:"analyze-partition-concurrency-quota"`
PlanReplayerDumpWorkerConcurrency uint `toml:"plan-replayer-dump-worker-concurrency" json:"plan-replayer-dump-worker-concurrency"`
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about using a SQL variable instead of a config item? SQL variables are much easier to use.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we can't adjust worker count in runtime thus we use config.

@Yisaer Yisaer requested a review from qw4990 November 28, 2022 09:23
}
<-do.exit
do.planReplayerHandle.planReplayerTaskDumpHandle.Close()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to also put Close in defer?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Dec 2, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Dec 6, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Dec 6, 2022
@qw4990
Copy link
Contributor

qw4990 commented Dec 6, 2022

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 12e838a158f17943186a76a74fff1987f7d5cc49

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Dec 6, 2022
@Yisaer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yisaer commented Dec 6, 2022

/merge

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. and removed status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. labels Dec 7, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 7, 2022
@Yisaer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yisaer commented Dec 7, 2022

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: dd20da9

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Dec 7, 2022
@Yisaer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yisaer commented Dec 7, 2022

/run-check_dev_2

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit a0a16d7 into pingcap:master Dec 7, 2022
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Dec 7, 2022

TiDB MergeCI notify

🔴 Bad News! New failing [1] after this pr merged.
These new failed integration tests seem to be caused by the current PR, please try to fix these new failed integration tests, thanks!

CI Name Result Duration Compare with Parent commit
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/common-test 🟥 failed 1, success 10, total 11 11 min New failing
idc-jenkins-ci/integration-cdc-test 🔴 failed 1, success 39, total 40 21 min Existing failure
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-common-test ✅ all 17 tests passed 20 min Fixed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-1 🟢 all 26 tests passed 6 min 56 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-2 🟢 all 28 tests passed 6 min 56 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/tics-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 5 min 56 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-ddl-test 🟢 all 6 tests passed 5 min 35 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mybatis-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 4 min 7 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-compatibility-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 3 min 18 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/plugin-test 🟢 build success, plugin test success 4min Existing passed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants