Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

executor: fix IndexMerge handle panic logic (#41036) #41063

Merged

Conversation

ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This is an automated cherry-pick of #41036

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #41047

Problem Summary:
There are five kinds of workers in IndexMergeReaderExecutor:

  1. partialIndexWorker/partialTableWorker: get handles from rows, then send handles to processWorker.
  2. processWorker: do Union or Intersection of handles., then send handles to tableScanWorker. Also it send task to main goroutine using resultCh.
  3. tableScanWorker: fetch row from tikv using handles, then send rows to main goroutine
  4. partTblIntersectionWorker: For dynamic partition table, for each partition, start a goroutine to do intersection. This is to speed up intersection processing.
  5. main goroutine: wait for tableScanWorker to get rows.

Why panic:

  1. processWorker finish, so it close resultCh. code
  2. partialIndexWorker got error, then try to send error using resultCh. code
  3. got write to closed channel panic.

What is changed and how it works?

  1. partialIndexWorker/partialTableWorker should not use resultCh to send error. Instead should use fetchCh, which is used to send task to processWorker.
  2. processWorker should check err in task, which is received from fetchCh. If got error, just stop processing.
  3. add handleIntersectionProcessWorkerPanic(), which is similar to handleLoopFetcherPanic. The latter will close(resultCh) when return.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    1. load data using lighning, too large to upload
    2. run sql as follows, and tidb doesn't crash when SQL is canceled because oom.
use s11_indexmerge_test;

set global tidb_server_memory_limit="500MB";
explain analyze select /*+ use_index_merge(tp2) */ * from tp2 where a < 40000000 or b < 40000000;
explain analyze select /*+ use_index_merge(tp2, ia, ib) */ * from tp2 where a < 40000000 and b < 40000000;

set tidb_mem_quota_query = 1000;
explain analyze select /*+ use_index_merge(tp2) */ * from tp2 where a < 40000000 or b < 40000000;
explain analyze select /*+ use_index_merge(tp2, ia, ib) */ * from tp2 where a < 40000000 and b < 40000000;

set tidb_mem_quota_query = 10<<20;
explain analyze select /*+ use_index_merge(tp2) */ * from tp2 where a < 40000000 or b < 40000000;
explain analyze select /*+ use_index_merge(tp2, ia, ib) */ * from tp2 where a < 40000000 and b < 40000000;

set tidb_mem_quota_query = 500<<20;
explain analyze select /*+ use_index_merge(tp2) */ * from tp2 where a < 40000000 or b < 40000000;
explain analyze select /*+ use_index_merge(tp2, ia, ib) */ * from tp2 where a < 40000000 and b < 40000000;
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            set tidb_mem_quota_query = 1<<30;
explain analyze select /*+ use_index_merge(tp2) */ * from tp2 where a < 40000000 or b < 40000000;
explain analyze select /*+ use_index_merge(tp2, ia, ib) */ * from tp2 where a < 40000000 and b < 40000000;

  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

executor: fix IndexMerge handle panic logic

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

ti-chi-bot commented Feb 5, 2023

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • XuHuaiyu
  • windtalker

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. type/cherry-pick-for-release-6.5 This PR is cherry-picked to release-6.5 from a source PR. labels Feb 5, 2023
Signed-off-by: guo-shaoge <[email protected]>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Feb 6, 2023
@VelocityLight VelocityLight added cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. and removed do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved labels Feb 6, 2023
Signed-off-by: guo-shaoge <[email protected]>
@guo-shaoge
Copy link
Collaborator

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

@guo-shaoge: /merge in this pull request requires 2 approval(s).

In response to this:

/merge

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@guo-shaoge
Copy link
Collaborator

/test build

Copy link
Contributor

@windtalker windtalker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Feb 9, 2023
@guo-shaoge
Copy link
Collaborator

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 6574662

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Feb 9, 2023
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

@ti-chi-bot: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@purelind
Copy link
Contributor

purelind commented Feb 9, 2023

/retest

1 similar comment
@guo-shaoge
Copy link
Collaborator

/retest

@guo-shaoge
Copy link
Collaborator

/test unit-test

2 similar comments
@guo-shaoge
Copy link
Collaborator

/test unit-test

@guo-shaoge
Copy link
Collaborator

/test unit-test

@hawkingrei
Copy link
Member

/retest

1 similar comment
@purelind
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@guo-shaoge
Copy link
Collaborator

No idea why this case fail

   testing.go:1319: race detected during execution of test
--- FAIL: TestCaptureUserFilter (80.73s)

WARNING: DATA RACE
Write at 0x00c00dd59d10 by goroutine 22028:
  runtime.mapassign_faststr()
      GOROOT/src/runtime/map_faststr.go:203 +0x0
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/util/stmtsummary.(*stmtSummaryByDigestElement).add()
      util/stmtsummary/statement_summary.go:708 +0x166
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/util/stmtsummary.(*stmtSummaryByDigest).add()
      util/stmtsummary/statement_summary.go:616 +0xb2
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/util/stmtsummary.(*stmtSummaryByDigestMap).AddStatement()
      util/stmtsummary/statement_summary.go:340 +0x590
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/executor.(*ExecStmt).SummaryStmt()
      executor/adapter.go:1819 +0x1bf1
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/executor.(*ExecStmt).FinishExecuteStmt()
      executor/adapter.go:1388 +0x7de
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/executor.(*ExecStmt).CloseRecordSet()
      executor/adapter.go:1418 +0x64
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/executor.(*recordSet).Close()
      executor/adapter.go:183 +0xcb
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/session.(*execStmtResult).Close()
      session/session.go:2405 +0x7e
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/testkit.(*TestKit).MustExecWithContext()
      testkit/testkit.go:132 +0x28f
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/testkit.(*TestKit).MustExec()
      testkit/testkit.go:122 +0xf7
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/bindinfo_test.TestCaptureUserFilter()
      bindinfo/capture_test.go:645 +0xb5a
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/session.runStmt()
      session/session.go:2350 +0x85c
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/session.(*session).ExecuteStmt()
      session/session.go:2214 +0x1266
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/testkit.(*TestKit).ExecWithContext()
      testkit/testkit.go:318 +0x84e
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/testkit.(*TestKit).MustExecWithContext()
      testkit/testkit.go:127 +0xb7
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/testkit.(*TestKit).MustExec()
      testkit/testkit.go:122 +0xf7
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/bindinfo_test.TestCaptureUserFilter()
      bindinfo/capture_test.go:613 +0xd0
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/domain.(*Domain).rebuildSysVarCache()
      domain/sysvar_cache.go:146 +0x73c
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/domain.(*Domain).LoadSysVarCacheLoop()
      domain/domain.go:1370 +0xb9
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/session.BootstrapSession()
      session/session.go:3315 +0x78c
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/domain.(*Domain).GetSessionCache()
      domain/sysvar_cache.go:62 +0x6a
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/session.(*session).loadCommonGlobalVariablesIfNeeded()
      session/session.go:3567 +0x11e
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/session.(*session).ExecuteStmt()
      session/session.go:2129 +0x2fb
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/session.(*session).ExecuteInternal()
      session/session.go:1675 +0x4eb
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/domain.(*Domain).LoadPrivilegeLoop()
      domain/domain.go:1312 +0x143
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/session.BootstrapSession()
      session/session.go:3308 +0x72c
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/testkit.bootstrap()
      testkit/mockstore.go:84 +0x84
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/testkit.CreateMockStoreAndDomain()
      testkit/mockstore.go:69 +0xd0
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/bindinfo_test.TestCaptureUserFilter()
      bindinfo/capture_test.go:609 +0x58
  testing.tRunner()
      GOROOT/src/testing/testing.go:1446 +0x216
  testing.(*T).Run.func1()
      GOROOT/src/testing/testing.go:1493 +0x47

Previous read at 0x00c00dd59d10 by goroutine 38466:
  runtime.mapiternext()
      GOROOT/src/runtime/map.go:866 +0x0
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/bindinfo.(*BindHandle).CaptureBaselines()
      bindinfo/handle.go:906 +0x1053
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/domain.(*Domain).globalBindHandleWorkerLoop.func1()
      domain/domain.go:1487 +0x519

Goroutine 22028 (running) created at:
  testing.(*T).Run()
      GOROOT/src/testing/testing.go:1493 +0x75d
  testing.runTests.func1()
      GOROOT/src/testing/testing.go:1846 +0x99
  testing.tRunner()
      GOROOT/src/testing/testing.go:1446 +0x216
  testing.runTests()
      GOROOT/src/testing/testing.go:1844 +0x7ec
  testing.(*M).Run()
      GOROOT/src/testing/testing.go:1726 +0xa84
  go.uber.org/goleak.VerifyTestMain()
      external/org_uber_go_goleak/testmain.go:53 +0x70
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/bindinfo_test.TestMain()
      bindinfo/main_test.go:32 +0x43c
  main.main()
      bazel-out/k8-fastbuild/bin/bindinfo/bindinfo_test_/testmain.go:276 +0x7c9

Goroutine 38466 (running) created at:
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/domain.(*Domain).globalBindHandleWorkerLoop()
      domain/domain.go:1461 +0x10a
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/domain.(*Domain).LoadBindInfoLoop()
      domain/domain.go:1454 +0x1f5
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/session.BootstrapSession()
      session/session.go:3302 +0x688
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/testkit.bootstrap()
      testkit/mockstore.go:84 +0x84
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/testkit.CreateMockStoreAndDomain()
      testkit/mockstore.go:69 +0xd0
  github.com/pingcap/tidb/bindinfo_test.TestCaptureUserFilter()
      bindinfo/capture_test.go:609 +0x58
  testing.tRunner()
      GOROOT/src/testing/testing.go:1446 +0x216
  testing.(*T).Run.func1()
      GOROOT/src/testing/testing.go:1493 +0x47
==================

@hawkingrei
Copy link
Member

/retest

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 99f338d into pingcap:release-6.5 Feb 11, 2023
@VelocityLight VelocityLight added do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. and removed cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved labels Mar 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. type/cherry-pick-for-release-6.5 This PR is cherry-picked to release-6.5 from a source PR.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants