-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
planner: add missing CanExprsPushDown
checks when generating IndexMerge path for or
(#41361)
#41396
planner: add missing CanExprsPushDown
checks when generating IndexMerge path for or
(#41361)
#41396
Conversation
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
/merge |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: 1a479c8
|
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
/retest |
4 similar comments
/retest |
/retest |
/retest |
/retest |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #41361
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #41273 close #41293
Problem Summary:
This bug is introduced by #30341.
This case is related to the
SET
type mainly. We don't support pushing down theSET
type now.util/ranger
also can't correctly handle expressions onSET
column. So it requires these expressions be blocked in advance. After #30341, such expressions can reachutil/ranger
without theCanExprsPushDown
check.What is changed and how it works?
Add a
CanExprsPushDown
check before using an expression to build an IndexMerge partial path.Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.