Incremental restore: fix the issue that backfill data is not covered by newTS (#54430)

[ti-chi-bot]

This is an automated cherry-pick of #54430

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #54426

Problem Summary:
see #54426 (comment)

What changed and how does it work?

make sure the rewritten data cover the backfilled data.

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

 fix the issue that backfill ddls(add index/modify column) may not restored correctly during incremental restore.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 10 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Please upload report for BASE (release-8.1@42b624c). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             release-8.1     #54997   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage               ?   71.1442%           
================================================
  Files                  ?       1465           
  Lines                  ?     422311           
  Branches               ?          0           
================================================
  Hits                   ?     300450           
  Misses                 ?     101357           
  Partials               ?      20504           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	71.1442% <0.0000%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
dumpling	53.9957% <0.0000%> (?)
parser	∅ <0.0000%> (?)
br	41.1264% <0.0000%> (?)

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: 3pointer, Leavrth

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• br/OWNERS [3pointer,Leavrth]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2024-08-02 05:21:51.139286797 +0000 UTC m=+66908.358048407: ☑️ agreed by 3pointer.
• 2024-08-02 05:32:26.782934616 +0000 UTC m=+67544.001696223: ☑️ agreed by Leavrth.