infoschema_v2: replace SchemaTableInfos in fetchShowStatsExtended

[fzzf678]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: ref #55394

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

In fetchShowStatsExtended , we traverse all dbs to find tables with partition and pass them to appendTableForStatsExtended. Now, the process of traversal can be replace by ListTablesWithSpecialAttribute.

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

  Just replace old loop logical with semantically equivalent function, use the exists cases check result is enough.

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

Use `ListTablesWithSpecialAttribute` to get tables which has partition.

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign winkyao for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[tiprow]

Hi @fzzf678. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[fzzf678]

/ok-to-test

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 64.70588% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 74.7859%. Comparing base (290dc46) to head (add99ba).
Report is 74 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #55687        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   72.9295%   74.7859%   +1.8563%     
================================================
  Files          1581       1582         +1     
  Lines        442365     442666       +301     
================================================
+ Hits         322615     331052      +8437     
+ Misses        99938      91341      -8597     
- Partials      19812      20273       +461     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	49.1101% <0.0000%> (?)
unit	71.8664% <64.7058%> (-0.1337%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
dumpling	52.9567% <ø> (ø)
parser	∅ <ø> (∅)
br	52.1593% <ø> (+6.7045%)	⬆️

[fzzf678]

/hold

[fzzf678]

Exclude partition table after get all table infos

[fzzf678]

Get simple table infos，then exclude partition tables，and then get tableInfo one by one

[ti-chi-bot]

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.