-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
statistics: reorder key and value generic parameters of the heap #55974
statistics: reorder key and value generic parameters of the heap #55974
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Rustin170506 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rustin170506 <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🔢 Self-check (PR reviewed by myself and ready for feedback.)
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #55974 +/- ##
=================================================
- Coverage 72.8586% 56.4363% -16.4223%
=================================================
Files 1605 1755 +150
Lines 446293 630992 +184699
=================================================
+ Hits 325163 356109 +30946
- Misses 101092 250460 +149368
- Partials 20038 24423 +4385
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: AilinKid, elsa0520, lance6716 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest |
Thanks for your review! 💚 💙 💜 💛 ❤️ |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: ref #55906
Problem Summary:
What changed and how does it work?
Just reorder the generic parameters of the heap. <V,K> -> <K,V>.
When I wrote this code, I thought it didn't matter, but it was kind of annoying when I tried to use it. So it's better to keep it like any other normal heap.
Also, I added
main_test
to check the goroutine leak.Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.