-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
planner,types: refactor the PR #8619 by using parser/types/FieldType.Clone() #8641
Conversation
/run-all-tests |
go.mod
Outdated
@@ -85,3 +85,5 @@ require ( | |||
sourcegraph.com/sourcegraph/appdash v0.0.0-20180531100431-4c381bd170b4 | |||
sourcegraph.com/sourcegraph/appdash-data v0.0.0-20151005221446-73f23eafcf67 | |||
) | |||
|
|||
replace github.com/pingcap/parser => github.com/cloud-pi/parser v0.0.0-20181211095502-1e4340922693 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
irrelevant change?
/rebuild |
/run-all-tests |
/run-common-test |
@zhouqiang-cl Could you please rebuild the PR? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
please waiting for pr in parser merged.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
/run-all-tests |
Please fix CI |
/rebuild |
It seems build failed
|
/rebuild |
/run-all-tests |
/run-common-test -tidb-test=pr/692 |
/run-all-tests |
/run-common-test -tidb-test=pr/693 |
3 similar comments
/run-common-test -tidb-test=pr/693 |
/run-common-test -tidb-test=pr/693 |
/run-common-test -tidb-test=pr/693 |
/run-integration-common-test -tidb-test=pr/693 |
/run-integration-ddl-test -tidb-test=pr/695 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
…ldType.Clone() (pingcap#8641)
What problem does this PR solve?
Refactor the merged PR #8619
What is changed and how it works?
types.CloneFieldType()" by introducing the member function
FieldType.Clone()in
parser/types``Check List
Tests
Code changes
Side effects
Related changes
parser/types/field_type.go
This change is