Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

tests: Add ut for parsing lock value #9214

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 11, 2024
Merged

tests: Add ut for parsing lock value #9214

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 11, 2024

Conversation

JaySon-Huang
Copy link
Contributor

@JaySon-Huang JaySon-Huang commented Jul 11, 2024 •
edited
Loading

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #7563

Problem Summary: Add ut for parsing lock value

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

None

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 11, 2024
CalvinNeo
CalvinNeo approved these changes Jul 11, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@CalvinNeo CalvinNeo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added approved needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Jul 11, 2024
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jul 11, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: CalvinNeo, Lloyd-Pottiger

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [CalvinNeo,Lloyd-Pottiger]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added lgtm and removed needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Jul 11, 2024
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jul 11, 2024

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2024-07-11 03:30:10.64382683 +0000 UTC m=+501107.879060945: ☑️ agreed by CalvinNeo.
  • 2024-07-11 03:39:27.196417069 +0000 UTC m=+501664.431651183: ☑️ agreed by Lloyd-Pottiger.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 93d7c81 into pingcap:master Jul 11, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Lloyd-Pottiger Lloyd-Pottiger Lloyd-Pottiger approved these changes

@CalvinNeo CalvinNeo CalvinNeo approved these changes

@JinheLin JinheLin Awaiting requested review from JinheLin

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
approved lgtm release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

TiFlash crash for invalid flag F in lock value
3 participants
@JaySon-Huang @CalvinNeo @Lloyd-Pottiger