redo(ticdc): return internal error in redo writer (#11011)

[ti-chi-bot]

This is an automated cherry-pick of #11011

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #10124

What is changed and how it works?

• return internal error in redo writer

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No code

Questions

Will it cause performance regression or break compatibility?

Do you need to update user documentation, design documentation or monitoring documentation?

Release note

`None`.

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: CharlesCheung96

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [CharlesCheung96]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 94.73684% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (release-8.1@9c38750). Click here to learn what that means.

Additional details and impacted files

Components	Coverage Δ
cdc	61.7961% <0.0000%> (?)
dm	51.2851% <0.0000%> (?)
engine	63.4091% <0.0000%> (?)

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	57.4920% <94.7368%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             release-8.1     #11093   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage               ?   57.4920%           
================================================
  Files                  ?        852           
  Lines                  ?     125786           
  Branches               ?          0           
================================================
  Hits                   ?      72317           
  Misses                 ?      48041           
  Partials               ?       5428           

[CharlesCheung96]

/retest

[CharlesCheung96]

/retest