-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 287
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ui(dm): spec v3 updates #5447
ui(dm): spec v3 updates #5447
Conversation
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
Codecov Report
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. @@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5447 +/- ##
================================================
- Coverage 56.1240% 55.7692% -0.3549%
================================================
Files 522 528 +6
Lines 65325 69637 +4312
================================================
+ Hits 36663 38836 +2173
- Misses 25094 27074 +1980
- Partials 3568 3727 +159 |
useEffect(() => { | ||
showMessage(startTaskResult) | ||
}, [startTaskResult.status]) | ||
|
||
useEffect(() => { | ||
showMessage(stopTaskResult) | ||
}, [stopTaskResult.status]) | ||
|
||
useEffect(() => { | ||
showMessage(deleteTaskResult) | ||
}, [deleteTaskResult.status]) | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I doubt these 3 useEffect
will cause hook dependency lint warning.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
@baurine: Thanks for your review. The bot only counts approvals from reviewers and higher roles in list, but you're still welcome to leave your comments. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i didn't find any obvious problems,just some notes need to adjust.
source_name_list?: string[] | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* RFC3339 format date string |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe we need to record format is like 2006-01-02T15:04:05
or 2006-01-02T15:04:05
and will give UTC time value to backend.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sure
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
/merge |
@zoubingwu: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
/merge |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: c3d8669
|
/merge |
/run-dm-integration-test |
/run-verify-ci |
/run-dm-integration-test |
/run-verify-ci |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: ref #5442
Check List
Tests
Release note