Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Supplier] Add supplier staking fee #883

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Oct 28, 2024
Merged

Conversation

red-0ne
Copy link
Contributor

@red-0ne red-0ne commented Oct 15, 2024

Summary

Replace the upstaking requirement with a staking fee when a stake is added or updated.

The staking fee will become a governance parameter in a follow up PR.

Issue

Type of change

Select one or more from the following:

  • New feature, functionality or library

Testing

  • Unit Tests: make go_develop_and_test
  • LocalNet E2E Tests: make test_e2e
  • DevNet E2E Tests: Add the devnet-test-e2e label to the PR.

Sanity Checklist

  • I have tested my changes using the available tooling
  • I have commented my code
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code; both comments & source code
  • I create and reference any new tickets, if applicable
  • I have left TODOs throughout the codebase, if applicable

@red-0ne red-0ne added supplier Changes related to the Supplier actor on-chain On-chain business logic labels Oct 15, 2024
@red-0ne red-0ne added this to the Shannon Beta TestNet Launch milestone Oct 15, 2024
@red-0ne red-0ne self-assigned this Oct 15, 2024
x/supplier/keeper/msg_server_stake_supplier.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
x/supplier/keeper/msg_server_stake_supplier.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
x/supplier/keeper/msg_server_stake_supplier.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
x/supplier/keeper/msg_server_stake_supplier.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
x/supplier/keeper/msg_server_stake_supplier_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
e2e/tests/stake_supplier.feature Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

The CI will now also run the e2e tests on devnet, which increases the time it takes to complete all CI checks.

You may need to run make trigger_ci to submit an empty commit that'll trigger the tests.

GCP workloads (requires changing the namespace to 883)
Grafana network dashboard for devnet-issue-883

@github-actions github-actions bot added devnet push-image CI related - pushes images to ghcr.io labels Oct 24, 2024
Copy link

gitguardian bot commented Oct 24, 2024

⚠️ GitGuardian has uncovered 1 secret following the scan of your pull request.

Please consider investigating the findings and remediating the incidents. Failure to do so may lead to compromising the associated services or software components.

🔎 Detected hardcoded secret in your pull request
GitGuardian id GitGuardian status Secret Commit Filename
12819930 Triggered Generic Password 0e4adfc localnet/kubernetes/values-pocketdex-postgres.yaml View secret
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
  1. Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
  2. Replace and store your secret safely. Learn here the best practices.
  3. Revoke and rotate this secret.
  4. If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.

To avoid such incidents in the future consider


🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.

x/supplier/keeper/msg_server_stake_supplier.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
x/supplier/keeper/msg_server_stake_supplier.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
x/supplier/keeper/msg_server_stake_supplier.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
x/supplier/keeper/msg_server_stake_supplier.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@bryanchriswhite bryanchriswhite left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One last suggestion but otherwise LGTM! 🚢

x/supplier/keeper/msg_server_stake_supplier_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@red-0ne red-0ne requested a review from Olshansk October 25, 2024 16:15
x/supplier/keeper/msg_server_stake_supplier.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@red-0ne red-0ne merged commit 78a7445 into main Oct 28, 2024
10 checks passed
bryanchriswhite added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2024
…tlement

# By Redouane Lakrache (3) and others
# Via GitHub
* pokt/main:
  [Observability] Foundation for load testing telemetry (#832)
  [Tokenomics] Implement Global Mint Reimbursement Request (#878)
  [Docs] Assign owners to all `TODO_BETA` (#898)
  [Supplier] Add supplier staking fee (#883)
  [Application] Single Service Applications (#886)

# Conflicts:
#	testutil/keeper/tokenomics.go
#	x/tokenomics/keeper/settle_pending_claims.go
#	x/tokenomics/keeper/token_logic_modules.go
#	x/tokenomics/keeper/token_logic_modules_test.go
#	x/tokenomics/module/abci.go
#	x/tokenomics/types/errors.go
bryanchriswhite added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2024
# By Redouane Lakrache (3) and others
# Via GitHub
* pokt/main:
  [Observability] Foundation for load testing telemetry (#832)
  [Tokenomics] Implement Global Mint Reimbursement Request (#878)
  [Docs] Assign owners to all `TODO_BETA` (#898)
  [Supplier] Add supplier staking fee (#883)
  [Application] Single Service Applications (#886)

# Conflicts:
#	x/supplier/keeper/msg_server_stake_supplier.go
#	x/supplier/keeper/msg_server_stake_supplier_test.go
#	x/supplier/keeper/msg_server_unstake_supplier_test.go
okdas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
## Summary

Replace the upstaking requirement with a staking fee when a stake is
added or updated.

The staking fee will become a governance parameter in a follow up PR.

## Issue

- #853 

## Type of change

Select one or more from the following:

- [x] New feature, functionality or library

## Testing

- [x] **Unit Tests**: `make go_develop_and_test`
- [x] **LocalNet E2E Tests**: `make test_e2e`
- [ ] **DevNet E2E Tests**: Add the `devnet-test-e2e` label to the PR.

## Sanity Checklist

- [x] I have tested my changes using the available tooling
- [x] I have commented my code
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code; both comments &
source code
- [ ] I create and reference any new tickets, if applicable
- [x] I have left TODOs throughout the codebase, if applicable
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
devnet devnet-test-e2e on-chain On-chain business logic push-image CI related - pushes images to ghcr.io supplier Changes related to the Supplier actor
Projects
Status: ✅ Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants