Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixed bugged conditionals in evaluate() #210

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 2, 2024

Conversation

kyledmiller
Copy link
Contributor

@kyledmiller kyledmiller commented Apr 2, 2024

Closes #209

Copy link
Collaborator

@ml-evs ml-evs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @kyledmiller, this clearly slipped through the net as we were all using custom evaluation functions before #194 anyway... I'll add a test for evaluate and then @ppdebreuck we can do a 0.4.3 release?

@ml-evs ml-evs merged commit 99c322b into ppdebreuck:master Apr 2, 2024
4 checks passed
@kyledmiller
Copy link
Contributor Author

Great! I really respect the rapid response. And thanks for building and maintaining this project as a whole. You've done some really great work here.

@ppdebreuck
Copy link
Owner

Good catch! Thanks @kyledmiller. Sure, will do a release tomorrow.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Evaluate() function of vanilla class broken for regression
3 participants