-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 431
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
speed test? #2
Comments
@ausk Well, I mean the numerical fps or cost per image |
I have test the CornerNet on my 1050ti device. The CornerNet-Squeeze costs 162ms per frame and CornerNet-Saccade costs 920ms per frame. As a comparison, the Darknet-yolov3 costs 100ms per frame. So the CornerNet did not run faster than yolov3 in my device, did anything wrong with my comparative experiment? |
I this network on my GTX950 device. All models are slower than yolov3. CornerNet's model used at least 0.6s to detect picture.but yolov3's model used at most 0.2s to detect the same picture.maybe I don't know how to test this model, I want to know how to test speed? |
I don't know how to do,but I think CornerNet is better than Yolo.you can ask other for help.
…---Original---
From: "DakeZjz"<[email protected]>
Date: 2019/4/27 13:36:28
To: "princeton-vl/CornerNet-Lite"<[email protected]>;
Cc: "Mention"<[email protected]>;"kalenforn"<[email protected]>;
Subject: Re: [princeton-vl/CornerNet-Lite] speed test? (#2)
@kalenforn I test on TITAN XP,and have the same result with you. Hope someone gets the right result as the paper said and tell us what the problem is.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
Any speed enhancement in lite version?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: