Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

addons/pyrra: Fix prometheus namespace connection #1734

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2022
Merged

addons/pyrra: Fix prometheus namespace connection #1734

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2022

Conversation

ArthurSens
Copy link
Member

Description

If kube-prometheus runs on a namespace different than monitoring, pyrra has network problems when communicating with prometheus

Type of change

What type of changes does your code introduce to the kube-prometheus? Put an x in the box that apply.

  • CHANGE (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • FEATURE (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • BUGFIX (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • ENHANCEMENT (non-breaking change which improves existing functionality)
  • NONE (if none of the other choices apply. Example, tooling, build system, CI, docs, etc.)

Changelog entry

Please put a one-line changelog entry below. Later this will be copied to the changelog file.

Fix a bug where pyrra can't connect to prometheus when deployed to a namespace other than 'monitoring'

Copy link
Member

@metalmatze metalmatze left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense 👍

jsonnet/kube-prometheus/addons/pyrra.libsonnet Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@paulfantom paulfantom merged commit 7b2a9fb into prometheus-operator:main Apr 25, 2022
@ArthurSens ArthurSens deleted the as/fix-pyrra-prom-ns branch April 25, 2022 13:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants