The depth of nested mixin is limited?

[gabrielbiga]

I'm having a problem with nested mixin.

mixin opa(id)
  #opa(xx=id)
    block

mixin opa2(id)
  #opa(xx=id)
    block

mixin opa3(id)
  #opa(xx=id)
    block

mixin opa4(id)
  #opa(xx=id)
    block

mixin opa5(id)
  #opa(xx=id)
    block

mixin opa6(id)
  #opa(xx=id)
    block    

mixin opa7(id)
  #opa(xx=id)
    block    

+opa(12)
  +opa2(13)
    +opa3(14)
      +opa4(15)
        +opa5(16)
          | xx
          +opa6(17)
            | xx
            +opa7(18)
              | zo

Where is "zo"?
I'm doing wrong or its a bug?

[jeromew]

just a passing remark. is it normal that you only have 1 space between opa3 and opa4 ? It seems to me that this is not valid

[gabrielbiga]

Even adding the space, the problem remains...

[jeromew]

don't ask my why you can check on http://jade-lang.com/demo/ the compiled javascript

your bug comes from the fact that you have trailing tabs/spaces after "block" in opa6 and opa7. This leads to block && block() not beeing inserted in the compiled javascript

[ForbesLindesay]

Minimal example of bug

mixin m(id)
  div
    block    

+m()
  | This text should appear

Should render:

<div>This text should appear</div>

but actually renders:

<div></div>

This is a bug.

[ForbesLindesay]

The fix for this is ready and will be released as part of 2.0.0