Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a std::filesystem::path <-> os.PathLike caster. #2730
Add a std::filesystem::path <-> os.PathLike caster. #2730
Changes from all commits
53da968
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is likely wrong. The
try_compile
failed in all three cases and we're going *shrug* "let's try it anyway!", so should probably be a fatal error.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think so? We could be on a compiler that doesn't support C++17 at all, in which case we'll be just fine, everything filesystem-related will be ifdef'd out anyways?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point. My project received complaints from users hitting this branch, but I unconditionally depend on
<filesystem>
. Maybe still wrap the whole block in anif ( standard is 17 )
or whatever the spelling is for cmake.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this have to be done as part of this PR? TBH I'm not so comfortable with cmake...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This can’t be done in CMake in general, too many ways someone could set the std level, though since it’s our tests we can do it. I can look at this later if it’s needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll throw in peanut-gallery 2 cents: Looks good for a starting point! Can address acute defects after merge?