Add documentation and code examples for consider-using-with

[DudeNr33]

• Write a good description on what the PR does.
• If you used multiple emails or multiple names when contributing, add your mails
  and preferred name in script/.contributors_aliases.json

Type of Changes

	Type
	🐛 Bug fix
	✨ New feature
	🔨 Refactoring
✓	📜 Docs

Description

Good and bad examples for consider-using-with.
I decided to stick with the most obvious example.
The original PR and list of stdlib callables that are checked is based on this blog post.
Should we include that in related.rst, or should we stick to the official documentation only?

Ref: #5953

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 2050609103

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 94.154%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 2047793050:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	15334
Relevant Lines:	16286

---

💛 - Coveralls

[Pierre-Sassoulas]

I think the article you used would be great in the related links.

[DudeNr33]

Thanks for the feedback, added it.