-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 251
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix unicode error #136
Fix unicode error #136
Conversation
This fixes python-poetry#221 by exchanging the regex package for re (the former having fixed the long-standing bug in re (see [here](lark-parser/lark#590) for details). Not sure if this will work for poetry (i.e., whether adding regex as a dependency is acceptable)...but thought I would propose this change and wait for feedback to take it from there. Thanks!
Thank you for the PR! Can you rebase against main and resolve the conflicts? |
* Update CI files for Python 3.6+ only * Modernize codebase * Reorganize imports to improve performance
The sync target previously regenerated the poetry.lock for vendored packages, causing larger than necessary change set for patches. This change introduces the update target to specifically handle lock file updates, lock target to regenerate the lock file and repurpose the sync target to only sync as expected.
Setting develop to `True` by default causes un-expected side-effects and requires downstream consumers to rely on checks like `package.develop and package.source_type == "directory""` to determine if develop mode. This also corresponds to current high-level behaviour of packages being non-develop by default.
Thanks @stephsamson ! I rebased, added failing tests, and pushed again (all local tests passing with latest commit). Please do let me know what else would be needed. |
P.S. I just reformatted. It currently seems to fail because regex is missing as a dependency; do you happen to know where I should specify it? (Would adding it to |
Superseded by #276 |
This fixes #221 by exchanging the regex package for re (the former having fixed the long-standing bug in re (see here for details). Not sure if this will work for poetry (i.e., whether adding regex as a dependency is acceptable)...but thought I would propose this change and wait for feedback to take it from there.
Thanks!
Resolves: python-poetry/poetry#221
Unfortunately couldn't figure out where to add the tests. Let me know and I will gladly do so!