Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

singledispatchmethod significantly slower than singledispatch #85160

Closed
CaselIT mannequin opened this issue Jun 15, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

singledispatchmethod significantly slower than singledispatch #85160

CaselIT mannequin opened this issue Jun 15, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
performance Performance or resource usage stdlib Python modules in the Lib dir type-feature A feature request or enhancement

Comments

@CaselIT
Copy link
Mannequin

CaselIT mannequin commented Jun 15, 2020

BPO 40988
Nosy @mental32, @CaselIT
PRs
  • gh-85160: Optimized singledispatchmethod access (noticeable improvement). #23213
  • Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

    Show more details

    GitHub fields:

    assignee = None
    closed_at = None
    created_at = <Date 2020-06-15.20:14:13.251>
    labels = ['3.8', 'library', 'performance']
    title = 'singledispatchmethod significantly slower than singledispatch'
    updated_at = <Date 2020-11-10.05:12:05.587>
    user = 'https://github.com/CaselIT'

    bugs.python.org fields:

    activity = <Date 2020-11-10.05:12:05.587>
    actor = 'mental'
    assignee = 'none'
    closed = False
    closed_date = None
    closer = None
    components = ['Library (Lib)']
    creation = <Date 2020-06-15.20:14:13.251>
    creator = 'CaselIT'
    dependencies = []
    files = []
    hgrepos = []
    issue_num = 40988
    keywords = ['patch']
    message_count = 1.0
    messages = ['371594']
    nosy_count = 2.0
    nosy_names = ['mental', 'CaselIT']
    pr_nums = ['23213']
    priority = 'normal'
    resolution = None
    stage = 'patch review'
    status = 'open'
    superseder = None
    type = 'performance'
    url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue40988'
    versions = ['Python 3.8']

    Linked PRs

    @CaselIT
    Copy link
    Mannequin Author

    CaselIT mannequin commented Jun 15, 2020

    The implementation of singledispatchmethod is significantly slower (~4x) than the normal singledispatch version

    Using timeit to test this example case:

        from functools import singledispatch, singledispatchmethod
        import timeit
    
        class Test:
            @singledispatchmethod
            def go(self, item, arg):
                print('general')
            
            @go.register
            def _(self, item:int, arg):
                return item + arg
    
        @singledispatch
        def go(item, arg):
            print('general')
    
        @go.register
        def _(item:int, arg):
            return item + arg
    print(timeit.timeit('t.go(1, 1)', globals={'t': Test()}))
    print(timeit.timeit('go(1, 1)', globals={'go': go}))
    

    Prints on my system.

    3.118346
    0.713173
    

    Looking at the singledispatchmethod implementation I believe that most of the difference is because a new function is generated every time the method is called.

    Maybe an implementation similar to cached_property could be used if the class has __dict__ attribute?
    Trying this simple patch

    diff --git a/Lib/functools.py b/Lib/functools.py
    index 5cab497..e42f485 100644
    --- a/Lib/functools.py
    +++ b/Lib/functools.py
    @@ -900,6 +900,7 @@ class singledispatchmethod:
    
                self.dispatcher = singledispatch(func)
                self.func = func
        +        self.attrname = None
    
            def register(self, cls, method=None):
                """generic_method.register(cls, func) -> func
        @@ -908,6 +909,10 @@ class singledispatchmethod:
                """
                return self.dispatcher.register(cls, func=method)
    +    def __set_name__(self, owner, name):
    +        if self.attrname is None:
    +            self.attrname = name
    +
        def __get__(self, obj, cls=None):
            def _method(*args, **kwargs):
                method = self.dispatcher.dispatch(args[0].__class__)
    @@ -916,6 +921,7 @@ class singledispatchmethod:
            _method.__isabstractmethod__ = self.__isabstractmethod__
            _method.register = self.register
            update_wrapper(_method, self.func)
    +        obj.__dict__[self.attrname] = _method
            return _method
    
        @property
    

    improves the performance noticeably

    0.9720976
    0.7269078
    

    @CaselIT CaselIT mannequin added 3.8 (EOL) end of life stdlib Python modules in the Lib dir performance Performance or resource usage labels Jun 15, 2020
    @ezio-melotti ezio-melotti transferred this issue from another repository Apr 10, 2022
    @iritkatriel iritkatriel added 3.12 bugs and security fixes and removed 3.8 (EOL) end of life labels Sep 9, 2022
    @iritkatriel
    Copy link
    Member

    I see a similar time difference on main.

    @AlexWaygood
    Copy link
    Member

    #107148 significantly optimised @singledispatchmethod for all non-slotted classes. If anybody can think of further optimisations that can be safely applied, I suggest a new issue should be opened for them.

    Thanks @casselt for the report, and thanks @mental32 and @eendebakpt for working on this!

    AlexWaygood added a commit to AlexWaygood/cpython that referenced this issue Aug 7, 2023
    AlexWaygood added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 7, 2023
    A small followup to #107148
    
    Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <[email protected]>
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    performance Performance or resource usage stdlib Python modules in the Lib dir type-feature A feature request or enhancement
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    2 participants