Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add branches in PR template #445

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 17, 2023
Merged

add branches in PR template #445

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 17, 2023

Conversation

Edoardo-Pedicillo
Copy link
Contributor

I would like to introduce this new PR template to force people to specify which branches should be used by the reviewers to test the PRs.

Checklist:

  • Reviewers confirm new code works as expected.
  • Tests are passing.
  • Coverage does not decrease.
  • Documentation is updated.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 17, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #445 (2eb7d3b) into main (5cd0b1d) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #445   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.03%   97.03%           
=======================================
  Files          48       48           
  Lines        3107     3107           
=======================================
  Hits         3015     3015           
  Misses         92       92           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 97.03% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@andrea-pasquale andrea-pasquale added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 17, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit 8694630 Jul 17, 2023
@andrea-pasquale andrea-pasquale deleted the PR_template branch July 17, 2023 11:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants