Updates in Cross Resonance calibration routines

[jevillegasdatTII]

Follow up on #821 and PR #860

Checklist:

• Reviewers confirm new code works as expected.
• Tests are passing.
• Coverage does not decrease.
• Documentation is updated.
• Compatibility with Qibo modules (Please edit this section if the current pull request is not compatible with the following branches).
  • Qibo: master
  • Qibolab: main
  • Qibolab_platforms_qrc: main

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 54.43548% with 113 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 96.02%. Comparing base (7a7c18e) to head (1da4d51).
Report is 672 commits behind head on cross_resonance.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...t_interaction/cross_resonance/chevron_frequency.py	49.45%	46 Missing ⚠️
...ction/cross_resonance/cross_resonance_sequences.py	39.13%	42 Missing ⚠️
...ols/two_qubit_interaction/cross_resonance/utils.py	0.00%	25 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           cross_resonance     #987      +/-   ##
===================================================
- Coverage            97.30%   96.02%   -1.28%     
===================================================
  Files                  112      115       +3     
  Lines                 8194     8402     +208     
===================================================
+ Hits                  7973     8068      +95     
- Misses                 221      334     +113     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	96.02% <54.43%> (-1.28%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/qibocal/protocols/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ibocal/protocols/two_qubit_interaction/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...protocols/two_qubit_interaction/chevron/chevron.py	96.87% <ø> (ø)
.../two_qubit_interaction/cross_resonance/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...s/two_qubit_interaction/cross_resonance/chevron.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...bit_interaction/cross_resonance/cross_resonance.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ols/two_qubit_interaction/cross_resonance/utils.py	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ction/cross_resonance/cross_resonance_sequences.py	39.13% <39.13%> (ø)
...t_interaction/cross_resonance/chevron_frequency.py	49.45% <49.45%> (ø)

[jevillegasdatTII]

In none of the routines using sweepers, the readout pulse is swept at the same as the CR drive pulse duration, similar to what was discussed in #qiboab/919. I'm not sure how can I do this correctly, but since the typical tests I was running re ~400 ns, this wasn't a problem yet.

[alecandido]

@jevillegasdatTII there is an ongoing PR, qiboteam/qibolab#993, realized by @hay-k, which is restoring some expected Qblox behavior on top of a Qibolab version compatible with the current Qibocal.

Did you try the corresponding branch https://github.com/qiboteam/qibolab/tree/qblox-ad-hoc-features?