Replace YAML runcard with JSON ones

[alecandido]

Closes #762

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (d869de0) 63.81% compared to head (2b96468) 63.81%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           kernel     #782   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   63.81%   63.81%           
=======================================
  Files          48       48           
  Lines        5771     5771           
=======================================
  Hits         3683     3683           
  Misses       2088     2088           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	63.81% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[stavros11]

Looks good to me. I would just ask @scarrazza if he agrees with the change, because historically we were using json and he proposed moving to yaml (I am guessing for readability?).

[scarrazza]

It is fine by me, supposing json will reduce complexity in terms of dependencies.

[stavros11]

@andrea-pasquale @alecandido I spoke with @aorgazf and he also agrees with this change, so if this is ready we can merge and I will propagate the changes to qibolab_platforms_qrc.

[andrea-pasquale]

@andrea-pasquale @alecandido I spoke with @aorgazf and he also agrees with this change, so if this is ready we can merge and I will propagate the changes to qibolab_platforms_qrc.

Good, @stavros11 I might have the majority of the JSON ready for qibolab_platform_qrc. I can take of that if you want.

[alecandido]

@stavros11 now it is merged. It will be anyhow in the next release, so no need to rush for the changes in the qibolab_platforms_qrc (for as long as people will use the latest release, of course it will be required for testing new PRs in Qibolab)

[stavros11]

Good, @stavros11 I might have the majority of the JSON ready for qibolab_platform_qrc. I can take of that if you want.

Thanks, if you already have them feel free to open a PR. Otherwise I will do it later or tomorrow.

@stavros11 now it is merged. It will be anyhow in the next release, so no need to rush for the changes in the qibolab_platforms_qrc (for as long as people will use the latest release, of course it will be required for testing new PRs in Qibolab)

I am not sure if there is anyone (other than qibocal CI) that is using releases, but in any case it will be useful to have at least a PR with the json runcards to be able to keep developing on qibolab main.

[alecandido]

I believe Qibocal should usually develop against releases, and only sometimes using the Git version (when a new Qibolab feature is strictly required).

[andrea-pasquale]

Indeed with the current workflow Qibocal is only working with releases.
This is why usually I push for qibolab releases 😄

[alecandido]

This is why usually I push for qibolab releases 😄

I know, this is the unpleasant part, and the motivation for monorepos. However, hopefully it will happen less and less :)