Fix OIDC Auth Quickstart failures

[gtroitsk]

Closes issue #1461

CodeFlowTest fails after deleting index.html in #1459. Test needs to provide own html page

Check list:

Your pull request:

• targets the development branch
• uses the 999-SNAPSHOT version of Quarkus
• has tests (mvn clean test)
• works in native (mvn clean package -Pnative)
• has integration/native tests (mvn clean verify -Pnative)
• makes sure the associated guide must not be updated
• links the guide update pull request (if needed)
• updates or creates the README.md file (with build and run instructions)
• for new quickstart, is located in the directory component-quickstart
• for new quickstart, is added to the root pom.xml and README.md

[holly-cummins]

Thanks! I wonder why the CI was green for my change?

[gtroitsk]

Thanks! I wonder why the CI was green for my change?

As I can see, CI wasn't triggered in your PR

[holly-cummins]

Thanks! I wonder why the CI was green for my change?

As I can see, CI wasn't triggered in your PR

You're right, https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus-quickstarts/pull/1459/checks is totally empty. I've looked in the PR workflow definition and can't see anything that would skip the CI for that kind of change.

However, looking at the history of the PR, I see that at some point I clicked the wrong thing, and raised the PR against main, not development. I fixed that, but perhaps by then the CI had been bypassed. I'll raise an issue to discuss possible solutions (and if we should bother fixing): #1465

[gtroitsk]

Failure in vertx-quickstart is unrelated and will be fixed by #1462

[rsvoboda]

@gtroitsk can you please rebase the PR, I merged #1462

[gtroitsk]

@gtroitsk can you please rebase the PR, I merged #1462

Rebased. Can you please retrigger CI, I don't have rights

[quarkus-bot]

Status for workflow Pull Request Build - development

This is the status report for running Pull Request Build - development on commit b5563b3.

✅ The latest workflow run for the pull request has completed successfully.

It should be safe to merge provided you have a look at the other checks in the summary.