Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CTM-ETM coupling: final changes #3111

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 30, 2024
Merged

CTM-ETM coupling: final changes #3111

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 30, 2024

Conversation

mabijkerk
Copy link
Member

@mabijkerk mabijkerk commented Aug 29, 2024

This PR includes final improvements for the CTM-ETM coupling improvements done in #3095. Specifically, this simplifies a number of external coupling queries and makes them more robust. It focuses on updating the inputs for setting the demand in the other metals, aluminium, food, paper and other industry sector.

To do:

  • Update input elements and locales in ETModel accordingly on ctm-etm-coupling-final branch and open PR
  • Update overview Excel with external coupling inputs accordingly

Goes with:

Copy link
Contributor

@kndehaan kndehaan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Two comments before approve for merge:

  • Remove redundant external coupling share input other metals
  • Restore electricity share in external coupling route for other metals

@mabijkerk
Copy link
Member Author

@kndehaan I picked up your requested changes and updated the Excel. Could you please verify my work?

Copy link
Contributor

@kndehaan kndehaan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Final changes are looking good.

@mabijkerk mabijkerk merged commit a67ca34 into master Aug 30, 2024
1 check passed
@mabijkerk mabijkerk deleted the ctm-etm-coupling-final branch August 30, 2024 06:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants