Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Retire ra file handle #316

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 8, 2023
Merged

Retire ra file handle #316

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 8, 2023

Conversation

kjnilsson
Copy link
Contributor

@kjnilsson kjnilsson commented Oct 12, 2022

As it adds fixed overhead to each disk IO operation and duplicates
information that is better accessed by the operation system.

To compensate this adds a "bytes written" counter to the wal and
segment writer processes respectively. This will allow of inspection
of Ra component specific IO use to some degree.

@kjnilsson kjnilsson marked this pull request as ready for review December 6, 2022 14:40
@kjnilsson kjnilsson added this to the 2.5.0 milestone Feb 17, 2023
@kjnilsson kjnilsson force-pushed the retire-ra-file-handle branch 2 times, most recently from a630e9b to fe244c5 Compare February 17, 2023 15:31
As it adds fixed overhead to each disk IO operation and duplicates
information that is better accessed by the operation system.

To compensate this adds a "bytes written" counter to the wal and
segment writer processes respectively. This will allow of inspection
of Ra component specific IO use to some degree.

Add snapshot_bytes_written counter

unrelated test reliability

Add ra log gauge for number of opened segments.
@kjnilsson kjnilsson merged commit 0bc7773 into main Mar 8, 2023
@michaelklishin michaelklishin deleted the retire-ra-file-handle branch October 26, 2023 09:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant