Github Action to create Docker image

[tschumpr]

This action builds a docker image whenever a new release is published. The image is named after the release tag, e.g. tag v.3.1.0-test results in the image 3.1.0.-test.

[pedroetb]

Hi @tschumpr, thanks for your contribution!

I was trying to use this image https://github.com/GeoWerkstatt/stac-browser/pkgs/container/stac-browser (image ghcr.io/geowerkstatt/stac-browser:3.1.0) but it's not working. I'm getting only a white page and errors while loading app.js and chunk-vendors.js.

Same configuration is working for me when using an image built by myself from https://github.com/radiantearth/stac-browser/tree/ae7e5cf1c98dc7cd9c03f5e1a4d333556e345b8e.

[pedroetb]

After checking it twice, now I see that your image is trying to get resources from path /browser, instead of /. I made a symlink at Nginx for testing, /usr/share/nginx/html/browser pointing to /usr/share/nginx/html , and it's working.

Maybe you set this path prefix at build time for ghcr.io/geowerkstatt/stac-browser:3.1.0 image?

[tschumpr]

@pedroetb We had to do the adjustment of /browser in our fork for some internal reasons but these changes are not part of this PR. If you want to test the image created with the changes in this PR, you can use the one from my private fork, the publish script is the exact same: https://github.com/tschumpr/stac-browser/pkgs/container/stac-browser.

[pedroetb]

Wow @tschumpr that was fast! Nice, already tested and working great for me, thanks!

When this PR gets merged (I hope so), I will migrate to ghcr.io/radiantearth/stac-browser image.

[m-mohr]

What do my Docker magicians think about this? Sounds like a good idea, I just don't have a clue about it myself. @geospatial-jeff @waystilos @constantinius

[waystilos]

What do my Docker magicians think about this? Sounds like a good idea, I just don't have a clue about it myself. @geospatial-jeff @waystilos @constantinius

lgtm! I just had one comment but other than that, it looks good. Happy new year!

[waystilos]

Looks good. Do we want to have the 'v' prefix from the tag name for the version?

[m-mohr]

Looks good to me. Left 3 minor comments. Once these are resolved, we I can merge this @tschumpr. Thanks for the PR.

Do I need to enable Packages on GitHub or something like that?

[tschumpr]

Looks good to me. Left 3 minor comments. Once these are resolved, we I can merge this @tschumpr. Thanks for the PR.

Do I need to enable Packages on GitHub or something like that?

@m-mohr The necessary packages should be enabled by default. Otherwise we'll see it if the action fails.

[m-mohr]

Thanks, let's see how it goes...