Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: potentially more fixes! #52

Merged
merged 49 commits into from
Apr 28, 2024
Merged

fix: potentially more fixes! #52

merged 49 commits into from
Apr 28, 2024

Conversation

SebassNoob
Copy link
Contributor

@SebassNoob SebassNoob commented Apr 19, 2024

idk yet

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced automated code formatting for backend and frontend.
    • Added user profile picture retrieval functionality.
    • Enhanced service session verification with additional metadata.
    • Implemented new classes for handling specific types of attendance exports.
    • Improved frontend profile page with loading state handling and user existence checks.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated HTTP status codes and added response expectations in API tests.
    • Fixed Dockerfile installation flags for handling missing packages.
  • Refactor

    • Updated validation functions across various backend endpoints.
    • Renamed and restructured models and methods for clarity and consistency.
    • Enhanced test coverage and dynamic handling in backend tests.
  • Style

    • Added CSS for handling profile not found scenarios in the frontend.
  • Documentation

    • None explicitly mentioned, but changes imply updates needed in API and model usage docs.
  • Chores

    • Updated workflow actions and added linting configurations.
    • Modified existing Dockerfile commands to improve package installation resilience.
  • Tests

    • Added new test scenarios for bulk updating service hours and improved test suite handling.
  • Revert

    • None mentioned.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 24, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates encompass a broad spectrum of enhancements across the backend and frontend of the application. Key changes include the introduction of automated code formatting workflows, significant refactoring in the backend models to improve clarity and functionality, and updates to testing and linting configurations. On the frontend, improvements focus on user experience enhancements such as loading states and error handling.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/autofix.yml Introduced a new workflow for automated code formatting using bun and prettier.
.github/workflows/pipeline.yml Updated job names, actions, and added steps for linting and testing.
interapp-backend/api/models/..., interapp-backend/api/routes/... Refactored models and routes, updated validation functions, and enhanced error handling. Added new functionalities in various models.
interapp-backend/eslint.config.js, interapp-backend/package.json Added ESLint configurations and updated scripts for linting and testing.
interapp-backend/scheduler/...Dockerfile Modified Dockerfiles to handle missing packages during installation.
interapp-backend/tests/... Updated test configurations, added new test cases, and improved test suite handling.
interapp-frontend/src/app/profile/page.tsx, .../styles.css Enhanced user experience by handling loading states, adding user existence checks, and updating CSS for profile not found scenarios. Simplified access to user data in various components.

These changes collectively aim to streamline development workflows, enhance code quality, and improve the user interface and experience, ensuring a more robust and maintainable application.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@SebassNoob
Copy link
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai review

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
interapp-backend/tests/unit/AttendanceExportsModel.test.ts (1)

10-84: The populateDb function is comprehensive and sets up necessary data for testing. However, consider adding error handling or comments explaining the failure modes, if any.

@SebassNoob
Copy link
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai review

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Out of diff range and nitpick comments (6)
interapp-frontend/src/app/exports/page.tsx (1)

Line range hint 11-26: Ensure that asynchronous data fetching in the Exports component is handled within a useEffect hook to avoid issues related to the component lifecycle and state updates.

interapp-frontend/src/app/attendance/absence/AbsenceForm/AbsenceForm.tsx (1)

Line range hint 9-23: Add error handling for the promise returned by handleSetValidReason in the handleSubmit method to prevent unhandled promise rejections.

interapp-frontend/src/app/services/page.tsx (1)

Line range hint 8-22: Refactor the ServicesPage component to be a standard function component. Use useEffect for data fetching and useState for managing state, instead of defining the component as an async function.

interapp-frontend/src/app/profile/ServiceSessionsPage/ServiceSessionsPage.tsx (1)

Line range hint 3-18: Improve error handling in the useEffect hook by catching errors during data fetching and updating the state accordingly to provide feedback to the user.

interapp-frontend/src/app/service_sessions/page.tsx (1)

Line range hint 6-39: Refactor the ServiceSessionPage component to be a standard function component. Use useEffect for data fetching and useState for managing state, instead of defining the component as an async function.

interapp-frontend/src/components/Navbar/NavbarNotifications/NavbarNotifications.tsx (1)

Line range hint 50-71: Consider adding a catch block to handle potential network errors or unexpected issues in the sendVerificationEmail function.

Comment on lines +32 to +37
if (res.status !== 200)
throw new ClientError({
message: 'Could not get notifications',
responseStatus: res.status,
responseBody: res.data,
});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider handling errors locally in the getNotifications function instead of throwing them, to prevent unhandled promise rejections in the component.

responseStatus,
}: Pick<ClientErrorParams, 'responseBody' | 'responseStatus'>): string {
if (!responseStatus && !responseBody) return '';
console.log(responseBody);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider removing the console.log(responseBody); as logging sensitive information can lead to security risks and it clutters the console in production.

@SebassNoob
Copy link
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai state any breaking changes to the end user

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 28, 2024

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@SebassNoob, based on the changes listed in the PR, here are the potential breaking changes to the end user:

Backend Changes:

  1. API Model Adjustments:

    • Changes in AuthModel, ExportsModel, and ServiceModel could potentially affect the data format expected by the frontend or external API consumers. If these models are used in public API endpoints, any change in their structure or the data they handle could break existing integrations.
  2. API Routes and Middleware Updates:

    • The introduction of a new validation schema FindServiceSessionUserFields and updates in API routes like announcement, auth, exports, and service might change the expected request format or the response structure. This could lead to breaking changes if the clients are not updated to accommodate these new requirements.

Frontend Changes:

  1. Component and State Management Updates:

    • Changes in components like AttendanceMenu and VerifyAttendance could alter the user interface or the way users interact with these components. If these changes significantly modify the user experience or remove/alter existing functionalities, they could be considered breaking changes from a user perspective.
  2. Type Adjustments and Simplifications:

    • The removal of UserWithProfilePicture type and its replacement with User might affect components that relied on the specific structure provided by UserWithProfilePicture. This could lead to issues if not properly managed in all parts of the frontend that utilize this type.

These are the areas where there might be breaking changes affecting the end users. It would be beneficial to ensure that all changes are well-documented and that any necessary migration steps or updates are clearly communicated to the users or developers integrating with the API.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
interapp-frontend/src/app/profile/page.tsx (1)

23-30: Handling the absence of user data by guiding them to log in again is a good user experience practice.

Consider enhancing the error message to provide more context or guidance, such as suggesting to check the network connection or contact support if the problem persists.

@SebassNoob
Copy link
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai review

@SebassNoob SebassNoob merged commit ad67c3e into main Apr 28, 2024
5 checks passed
Copy link

sentry-io bot commented Apr 29, 2024

Suspect Issues

This pull request was deployed and Sentry observed the following issues:

  • ‼️ Error: Failed to update service hours new ClientError(chunks/app/attendance/verify/sr... View Issue
  • ‼️ Error: Failed to update service hours updateServiceHours(chunks/app/attendance/verify... View Issue
  • ‼️ Error: Failed to update service hours new ClientError(chunks/app/src/utils/parseClien... View Issue
  • ‼️ Error: Failed to fetch user permissions new ClientError(chunks/app/src/utils/parseClien... View Issue
  • ‼️ Error: Failed to fetch user permissions n(chunks/7682) View Issue

Did you find this useful? React with a 👍 or 👎

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant