-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: potentially more fixes! #52
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates encompass a broad spectrum of enhancements across the backend and frontend of the application. Key changes include the introduction of automated code formatting workflows, significant refactoring in the backend models to improve clarity and functionality, and updates to testing and linting configurations. On the frontend, improvements focus on user experience enhancements such as loading states and error handling. Changes
These changes collectively aim to streamline development workflows, enhance code quality, and improve the user interface and experience, ensuring a more robust and maintainable application. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
@coderabbitai review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
interapp-backend/tests/unit/AttendanceExportsModel.test.ts (1)
10-84
: ThepopulateDb
function is comprehensive and sets up necessary data for testing. However, consider adding error handling or comments explaining the failure modes, if any.
@coderabbitai review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (6)
interapp-frontend/src/app/exports/page.tsx (1)
Line range hint
11-26
: Ensure that asynchronous data fetching in theExports
component is handled within auseEffect
hook to avoid issues related to the component lifecycle and state updates.interapp-frontend/src/app/attendance/absence/AbsenceForm/AbsenceForm.tsx (1)
Line range hint
9-23
: Add error handling for the promise returned byhandleSetValidReason
in thehandleSubmit
method to prevent unhandled promise rejections.interapp-frontend/src/app/services/page.tsx (1)
Line range hint
8-22
: Refactor theServicesPage
component to be a standard function component. UseuseEffect
for data fetching anduseState
for managing state, instead of defining the component as an async function.interapp-frontend/src/app/profile/ServiceSessionsPage/ServiceSessionsPage.tsx (1)
Line range hint
3-18
: Improve error handling in theuseEffect
hook by catching errors during data fetching and updating the state accordingly to provide feedback to the user.interapp-frontend/src/app/service_sessions/page.tsx (1)
Line range hint
6-39
: Refactor theServiceSessionPage
component to be a standard function component. UseuseEffect
for data fetching anduseState
for managing state, instead of defining the component as an async function.interapp-frontend/src/components/Navbar/NavbarNotifications/NavbarNotifications.tsx (1)
Line range hint
50-71
: Consider adding a catch block to handle potential network errors or unexpected issues in thesendVerificationEmail
function.
if (res.status !== 200) | ||
throw new ClientError({ | ||
message: 'Could not get notifications', | ||
responseStatus: res.status, | ||
responseBody: res.data, | ||
}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider handling errors locally in the getNotifications
function instead of throwing them, to prevent unhandled promise rejections in the component.
responseStatus, | ||
}: Pick<ClientErrorParams, 'responseBody' | 'responseStatus'>): string { | ||
if (!responseStatus && !responseBody) return ''; | ||
console.log(responseBody); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider removing the console.log(responseBody);
as logging sensitive information can lead to security risks and it clutters the console in production.
@coderabbitai state any breaking changes to the end user |
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @SebassNoob, based on the changes listed in the PR, here are the potential breaking changes to the end user: Backend Changes:
Frontend Changes:
These are the areas where there might be breaking changes affecting the end users. It would be beneficial to ensure that all changes are well-documented and that any necessary migration steps or updates are clearly communicated to the users or developers integrating with the API. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
interapp-frontend/src/app/profile/page.tsx (1)
23-30
: Handling the absence of user data by guiding them to log in again is a good user experience practice.Consider enhancing the error message to provide more context or guidance, such as suggesting to check the network connection or contact support if the problem persists.
@coderabbitai review |
Suspect IssuesThis pull request was deployed and Sentry observed the following issues:
Did you find this useful? React with a 👍 or 👎 |
idk yet
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Style
Documentation
Chores
Tests
Revert