-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 532
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[REVIEW] Exposing KL divergence in TSNE #4208
[REVIEW] Exposing KL divergence in TSNE #4208
Conversation
18a5809
to
273b685
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking good. As usual, mostly minor things.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approving ops-codeowner
file changes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, Victor, I thought I had submitted the re-review on this and just realized I still had comments pending. 2 very trivial things and I think this initial version is ready to go.
rerun tests |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## branch-21.12 #4208 +/- ##
===============================================
Coverage ? 86.04%
===============================================
Files ? 231
Lines ? 18714
Branches ? 0
===============================================
Hits ? 16103
Misses ? 2611
Partials ? 0
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@gpucibot merge |
Authors: - Victor Lafargue (https://github.com/viclafargue) Approvers: - AJ Schmidt (https://github.com/ajschmidt8) - Corey J. Nolet (https://github.com/cjnolet) URL: rapidsai#4208
Undefined behavior introduced in rapidsai#4208. These parameters are restrict-qualified, but the callers pass pointers with the same address and the arrays are modified through both pointers.
Undefined behavior introduced in #4208. These parameters are restrict-qualified, but the callers pass pointers with the same address and the arrays are modified through both pointers. Authors: - Zach Bjornson (https://github.com/zbjornson) Approvers: - Corey J. Nolet (https://github.com/cjnolet) URL: #4363
P_sum is equal to n. See rapidsai#2622 where I made this change once before. rapidsai#4208 changed it back while consolidating code.
P_sum is equal to n. See #2622 where I made this change once before. #4208 changed it back while consolidating code. Authors: - Zach Bjornson (https://github.com/zbjornson) Approvers: - Corey J. Nolet (https://github.com/cjnolet) URL: #4425
Authors: - Victor Lafargue (https://github.com/viclafargue) Approvers: - AJ Schmidt (https://github.com/ajschmidt8) - Corey J. Nolet (https://github.com/cjnolet) URL: rapidsai#4208
Undefined behavior introduced in rapidsai#4208. These parameters are restrict-qualified, but the callers pass pointers with the same address and the arrays are modified through both pointers. Authors: - Zach Bjornson (https://github.com/zbjornson) Approvers: - Corey J. Nolet (https://github.com/cjnolet) URL: rapidsai#4363
P_sum is equal to n. See rapidsai#2622 where I made this change once before. rapidsai#4208 changed it back while consolidating code. Authors: - Zach Bjornson (https://github.com/zbjornson) Approvers: - Corey J. Nolet (https://github.com/cjnolet) URL: rapidsai#4425
No description provided.