mm: memcg/slab: wait for !root kmem_cache refcnt killing on root kmem…

…_cache destruction

commit a264df7 upstream.

Christian reported a warning like the following obtained during running
some KVM-related tests on s390:

    WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 208 at lib/percpu-refcount.c:108 percpu_ref_exit+0x50/0x58
    Modules linked in: kvm(-) xt_CHECKSUM xt_MASQUERADE bonding xt_tcpudp ip6t_rpfilter ip6t_REJECT nf_reject_ipv6 ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 xt_conntrack ip6table_na>
    CPU: 8 PID: 208 Comm: kworker/8:1 Not tainted 5.2.0+ #66
    Hardware name: IBM 2964 NC9 712 (LPAR)
    Workqueue: events sysfs_slab_remove_workfn
    Krnl PSW : 0704e00180000000 0000001529746850 (percpu_ref_exit+0x50/0x58)
               R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:2 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3
    Krnl GPRS: 00000000ffff8808 0000001529746740 000003f4e30e8e18 0036008100000000
               0000001f00000000 0035008100000000 0000001fb3573ab8 0000000000000000
               0000001fbdb6de00 0000000000000000 0000001529f01328 0000001fb3573b00
               0000001fbb27e000 0000001fbdb69300 000003e009263d00 000003e009263cd0
    Krnl Code: 0000001529746842: f0a0000407fe        srp        4(11,%r0),2046,0
               0000001529746848: 47000700            bc         0,1792
              #000000152974684c: a7f40001            brc        15,152974684e
              >0000001529746850: a7f4fff2            brc        15,1529746834
               0000001529746854: 0707                bcr        0,%r7
               0000001529746856: 0707                bcr        0,%r7
               0000001529746858: eb8ff0580024        stmg       %r8,%r15,88(%r15)
               000000152974685e: a738ffff            lhi        %r3,-1
    Call Trace:
    ([<000003e009263d00>] 0x3e009263d00)
     [<00000015293252ea>] slab_kmem_cache_release+0x3a/0x70
     [<0000001529b04882>] kobject_put+0xaa/0xe8
     [<000000152918cf28>] process_one_work+0x1e8/0x428
     [<000000152918d1b0>] worker_thread+0x48/0x460
     [<00000015291942c6>] kthread+0x126/0x160
     [<0000001529b22344>] ret_from_fork+0x28/0x30
     [<0000001529b2234c>] kernel_thread_starter+0x0/0x10
    Last Breaking-Event-Address:
     [<000000152974684c>] percpu_ref_exit+0x4c/0x58
    ---[ end trace b035e7da5788eb09 ]---

The problem occurs because kmem_cache_destroy() is called immediately
after deleting of a memcg, so it races with the memcg kmem_cache
deactivation.

flush_memcg_workqueue() at the beginning of kmem_cache_destroy() is
supposed to guarantee that all deactivation processes are finished, but
failed to do so.  It waits for an rcu grace period, after which all
children kmem_caches should be deactivated.  During the deactivation
percpu_ref_kill() is called for non root kmem_cache refcounters, but it
requires yet another rcu grace period to finish the transition to the
atomic (dead) state.

So in a rare case when not all children kmem_caches are destroyed at the
moment when the root kmem_cache is about to be gone, we need to wait
another rcu grace period before destroying the root kmem_cache.

This issue can be triggered only with dynamically created kmem_caches
which are used with memcg accounting.  In this case per-memcg child
kmem_caches are created.  They are deactivated from the cgroup removing
path.  If the destruction of the root kmem_cache is racing with the
removal of the cgroup (both are quite complicated multi-stage
processes), the described issue can occur.  The only known way to
trigger it in the real life, is to unload some kernel module which
creates a dedicated kmem_cache, used from different memory cgroups with
GFP_ACCOUNT flag.  If the unloading happens immediately after calling
rmdir on the corresponding cgroup, there is some chance to trigger the
issue.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Fixes: f0a3a24 ("mm: memcg/slab: rework non-root kmem_cache lifecycle management")
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

mm/slab_common.c

@@ -904,6 +904,18 @@ static void flush_memcg_workqueue(struct kmem_cache *s)
 	 * previous workitems on workqueue are processed.
 	 */
 	flush_workqueue(memcg_kmem_cache_wq);
+
+	/*
+	 * If we're racing with children kmem_cache deactivation, it might
+	 * take another rcu grace period to complete their destruction.
+	 * At this moment the corresponding percpu_ref_kill() call should be
+	 * done, but it might take another rcu grace period to complete
+	 * switching to the atomic mode.
+	 * Please, note that we check without grabbing the slab_mutex. It's safe
+	 * because at this moment the children list can't grow.
+	 */
+	if (!list_empty(&s->memcg_params.children))
+		rcu_barrier();
 }
 #else
 static inline int shutdown_memcg_caches(struct kmem_cache *s)