-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 402
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CI] Add kind
-in-Docker test to Buildkite CI
#1243
[CI] Add kind
-in-Docker test to Buildkite CI
#1243
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Archit Kulkarni <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Archit Kulkarni <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Archit Kulkarni <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Archit Kulkarni <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Archit Kulkarni <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Archit Kulkarni <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Archit Kulkarni <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Archit Kulkarni <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Archit Kulkarni <[email protected]>
scripts/install-docker.sh
Outdated
export LANG=en_US.UTF-8 | ||
|
||
apt-get update -qq && apt-get upgrade -qq | ||
apt-get install -y -qq \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are these dependencies necessary for Docker installation?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would be beneficial to determine which dependencies are necessary and which are not. If merging this pull request is not time-sensitive, we can allocate some time to investigate this further.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense -- as far as timing is concerned we would just need it before the 0.6.0 release, since this issue depends on it: #1199
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed fd0b35e
Signed-off-by: Archit Kulkarni <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Archit Kulkarni <[email protected]>
Interesting failure here: https://buildkite.com/ray-project/ray-ecosystem-ci-kuberay-ci/builds/1044#018965e0-a40b-4f67-8c65-c763c33adbc0/129-325 Somehow a |
Signed-off-by: Archit Kulkarni <[email protected]>
Compatibility test failure unrelated, merging. |
This PR adds a Buildkite CI test that verifies that a kind cluster can be launched. This is a prerequisite for running end-to-end KubeRay tests in CI, so it makes sense to merge this PR even though KubeRay functionality isn't being tested yet. The PR uses the support added in ray-project/rayci#14. Related issue number Closes ray-project#1203 --------- Signed-off-by: Archit Kulkarni <[email protected]>
This PR adds a Buildkite CI test that verifies that a kind cluster can be launched. This is a prerequisite for running end-to-end KubeRay tests in CI, so it makes sense to merge this PR even though KubeRay functionality isn't being tested yet. The PR uses the support added in ray-project/rayci#14. Related issue number Closes ray-project#1203 --------- Signed-off-by: Archit Kulkarni <[email protected]>
This PR adds a Buildkite CI test that verifies that a kind cluster can be launched. This is a prerequisite for running end-to-end KubeRay tests in CI, so it makes sense to merge this PR even though KubeRay functionality isn't being tested yet. The PR uses the support added in ray-project/rayci#14. Related issue number Closes ray-project#1203 --------- Signed-off-by: Archit Kulkarni <[email protected]>
Why are these changes needed?
This PR adds a Buildkite CI test that verifies that a
kind
cluster can be launched. This is a prerequisite for running end-to-end KubeRay tests in CI, so it makes sense to merge this PR even though KubeRay functionality isn't being tested yet.The PR uses the support added in ray-project/rayci#14.
Related issue number
Closes #1203
Checks