Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature] Support for Pytorch-lightning 1.5.0 #20741

Closed
1 of 2 tasks
jamesbsilva opened this issue Nov 27, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed
1 of 2 tasks

[Feature] Support for Pytorch-lightning 1.5.0 #20741

jamesbsilva opened this issue Nov 27, 2021 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement Request for new feature and/or capability

Comments

@jamesbsilva
Copy link

Search before asking

  • I had searched in the issues and found no similar feature requirement.

Description

As of Pytorch-lightning 1.5.0

https://github.com/PyTorchLightning/pytorch-lightning/blob/49d09aa28b4bdde7a272c3e77dc3f13613802672/CHANGELOG.md#150---2021-11-02

The property running_sanity_check in the Trainer class has been deprecated in favor of sanity_checking as of 1.5.0 as linked above. This property is used in the following lines which I have been patching to support 1.5.0

if trainer.running_sanity_check:

if trainer.running_sanity_check:

Is there any plan to support 1.5.0+? I am not sure what the preferences are as far as dealingl with backcompatibility otherwise could submit a PR.

I tried searching about this although from the changelog above the complete deprecation of the property was just released in packages of just a few weeks ago.

Use case

Support for using the newer versions of pytorch-lightning .

Related issues

No response

Are you willing to submit a PR?

  • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!
@jamesbsilva jamesbsilva added the enhancement Request for new feature and/or capability label Nov 27, 2021
@richardliaw
Copy link
Contributor

I believe a similar PR to achieve this is being implemented by the great @kaushikb11?

#20562

@jamesbsilva
Copy link
Author

It looks like that will indeed make this a subset of that functionality. Nice, I cant wait until this is released.

@amogkam
Copy link
Contributor

amogkam commented Dec 18, 2021

Will keep this open until #20562 is merged

@dynamicwebpaige
Copy link
Contributor

dynamicwebpaige commented Mar 15, 2022

Would it make sense to close this issue, given that #20562 is now merged?

We might also want to reach out to the prob-ml/bliss team to reintroduce their Ray dependency, as it looks like they might have been blocked on Lightning support.

@amogkam
Copy link
Contributor

amogkam commented Apr 11, 2022

Yes this can be closed- Ray Tune supports PTL 1.5 as of #20562!

@amogkam amogkam closed this as completed Apr 11, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Request for new feature and/or capability
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants