Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Rllib/release] Disable throughput check #20387

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 16, 2021

Conversation

gjoliver
Copy link
Member

Throughput check was enabled by d8a61f8 prematurely.
E.g., see state before the commit:

# TODO(Jun): Stop checking throughput for now.
# desired_throughput = checks[experiment]["min_throughput"]

Why are these changes needed?

Disable throughput check that was accidentally enabled.
Good to know which Test still has significant performance gap though :)

Related issue number

Closes #20385

Checks

  • I've run scripts/format.sh to lint the changes in this PR.
  • I've included any doc changes needed for https://docs.ray.io/en/master/.
  • I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, see the recent failures at https://flakey-tests.ray.io/
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • [*] Release tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

@amogkam amogkam self-assigned this Nov 15, 2021
@amogkam
Copy link
Contributor

amogkam commented Nov 16, 2021

test is kicked off here https://buildkite.com/ray-project/periodic-ci/builds/1646#_

@amogkam amogkam changed the title Do not run throughput check yet. [Rllib/release] Disable throughput check Nov 16, 2021
@amogkam
Copy link
Contributor

amogkam commented Nov 16, 2021

learning_tests is passing, going to merge

@amogkam amogkam merged commit 6e787f7 into ray-project:master Nov 16, 2021
@gjoliver gjoliver deleted the no-throughput-check branch November 17, 2021 22:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[release][weekly] learning_tests failed
2 participants