Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RLlib] Discussion 4351: Conv2d default filter tests and add default setting for 96x96 image obs space. #21560

Conversation

sven1977
Copy link
Contributor

@sven1977 sven1977 commented Jan 12, 2022

Discussion 4351: Conv2d default filter tests and add default setting for 96x96 image obs space.

See also this discussion here:
https://discuss.ray.io/t/use-gym-wrappers-for-training/4351

Why are these changes needed?

Related issue number

Checks

  • I've run scripts/format.sh to lint the changes in this PR.
  • I've included any doc changes needed for https://docs.ray.io/en/master/.
  • I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, see the recent failures at https://flakey-tests.ray.io/
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Release tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

@sven1977 sven1977 requested a review from avnishn January 12, 2022 18:03
@sven1977 sven1977 added the tests-ok The tagger certifies test failures are unrelated and assumes personal liability. label Jan 13, 2022
2,
MODEL_DEFAULTS.copy(),
framework=fw)
self.assertTrue(
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How does the ModelCatalog know to retrieve a VisionNetwork or a TorchVision Network? There's nothing about the parameters of the function that indicate that we should be getting a vision ready network AFAICT

@sven1977 sven1977 merged commit 3ac4dab into ray-project:master Jan 13, 2022
@sven1977 sven1977 deleted the discussion_4351_conv2d_filter_tests_and_cover_96x96 branch June 2, 2023 20:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
tests-ok The tagger certifies test failures are unrelated and assumes personal liability.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants