Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RLlib] ONNX example script: Enhance to work with torch + LSTM #43592

Merged

Conversation

sven1977
Copy link
Contributor

@sven1977 sven1977 commented Mar 1, 2024

ONNX example script: Enhance to work with torch + LSTM

Why are these changes needed?

Related issue number

Checks

  • I've signed off every commit(by using the -s flag, i.e., git commit -s) in this PR.
  • I've run scripts/format.sh to lint the changes in this PR.
  • I've included any doc changes needed for https://docs.ray.io/en/master/.
    • I've added any new APIs to the API Reference. For example, if I added a
      method in Tune, I've added it in doc/source/tune/api/ under the
      corresponding .rst file.
  • I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, see the recent failures at https://flakey-tests.ray.io/
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Release tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

…_example_script_for_torch_plus_lstm

Signed-off-by: sven1977 <[email protected]>

# Conflicts:
#	rllib/examples/checkpoints/onnx_torch.py
Signed-off-by: sven1977 <[email protected]>
Copy link
Collaborator

@simonsays1980 simonsays1980 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

)
.environment("CartPole-v1")
.env_runners(num_env_runners=args.num_env_runners)
.training(model={"use_lstm": True})
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If enable_rl_module_and_learner is True, it needs the model_config in rl_module(model_config_dict= ...)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

True, but this examples does NOT work yet on the new stack. I'll add an assert that --enable-new-api-stack is off.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

# Evaluate tensor to fetch numpy array
result_pytorch = result_pytorch.detach().numpy()

# This line will export the model to ONNX.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The comment is a bid misleading - I guess it was intended for the code block below?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

Signed-off-by: sven1977 <[email protected]>
@sven1977 sven1977 enabled auto-merge (squash) June 14, 2024 11:15
@github-actions github-actions bot disabled auto-merge June 14, 2024 11:15
@github-actions github-actions bot added the go add ONLY when ready to merge, run all tests label Jun 14, 2024
@sven1977 sven1977 enabled auto-merge (squash) June 14, 2024 12:15
@github-actions github-actions bot disabled auto-merge June 14, 2024 12:19
@sven1977 sven1977 enabled auto-merge (squash) June 14, 2024 12:43
@sven1977 sven1977 added rllib RLlib related issues rllib-evaluation Bug affecting policy evaluation with RLlib. rllib-docs-or-examples Issues related to RLlib documentation or rllib/examples rllib-oldstack-cleanup Issues related to cleaning up classes, utilities on the old API stack labels Jun 14, 2024
@sven1977 sven1977 merged commit d15204f into ray-project:master Jun 14, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
go add ONLY when ready to merge, run all tests rllib RLlib related issues rllib-docs-or-examples Issues related to RLlib documentation or rllib/examples rllib-evaluation Bug affecting policy evaluation with RLlib. rllib-oldstack-cleanup Issues related to cleaning up classes, utilities on the old API stack
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants