-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[RLlib] Action masking example for new API stack. #46146
Merged
sven1977
merged 9 commits into
ray-project:master
from
simonsays1980:example-action-masking-new-stack
Jun 21, 2024
+329
−284
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
243d239
Implemented example for action masking. Added an 'unbatch(obs)' for '…
simonsays1980 00e1724
Included proposed changes from @sven1977's review. Added more docstri…
simonsays1980 2b10d68
Removed old-(hybrid)-stack action masking example b/c hybrid stack wi…
simonsays1980 b8f07e4
Merge branch 'master' into example-action-masking-new-stack
simonsays1980 14e9fa1
Removed old action masking example paths from rllib.tests.yml.
simonsays1980 79a8fb8
Changed naming for autoregressive actions module to conform with acti…
simonsays1980 d6918d5
Added the action masking example script after renaming and ran the li…
simonsays1980 d2045af
Fixed an arguments bug in 'ActionMaskingRLM._compute_values' and a wr…
simonsays1980 641688e
Merge branch 'master' into example-action-masking-new-stack
simonsays1980 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Strange: Shouldn't this already have caused a bug in the existing flatten obs example (which also uses a dict obs space)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think, the flatten obs example silently snuck around it: The
unbatch(obs)
was only forgotten in_sample_episodes
and not in_sample_timesteps
(has cost me a lot of time to figure it out thoug). Because the flatten obs does no evaluation - it never ran into it :DThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ahhh, yes, makes perfect sense. Thanks for catching this!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With
ray==2.24.0
,batch_mode="complete_episodes"
will cause the bug. Andobs = unbatch(obs)
should outter the for-loop like what_sample_timesteps
do: