Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RLlib; new API stack by default] Switch on new API stack by default for SAC and DQN. #47217

Conversation

sven1977
Copy link
Contributor

@sven1977 sven1977 commented Aug 20, 2024

Switch on new API stack by default for SAC and DQN.

Why are these changes needed?

Related issue number

Checks

  • I've signed off every commit(by using the -s flag, i.e., git commit -s) in this PR.
  • I've run scripts/format.sh to lint the changes in this PR.
  • I've included any doc changes needed for https://docs.ray.io/en/master/.
    • I've added any new APIs to the API Reference. For example, if I added a
      method in Tune, I've added it in doc/source/tune/api/ under the
      corresponding .rst file.
  • I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, see the recent failures at https://flakey-tests.ray.io/
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Release tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

Signed-off-by: sven1977 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: sven1977 <[email protected]>
…ch_on_new_api_stack_by_default_for_sac_and_dqn

Signed-off-by: sven1977 <[email protected]>

# Conflicts:
#	rllib/algorithms/dqn/tests/test_dqn.py
#	rllib/algorithms/ppo/tests/test_repro_ppo.py
#	rllib/algorithms/sac/sac.py
#	rllib/algorithms/sac/tests/test_rnnsac.py
#	rllib/algorithms/sac/tests/test_sac.py
@sven1977 sven1977 added rllib RLlib related issues rllib-newstack rllib-oldstack-cleanup Issues related to cleaning up classes, utilities on the old API stack labels Sep 21, 2024
Signed-off-by: sven1977 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: sven1977 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: sven1977 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: sven1977 <[email protected]>
Copy link
Collaborator

@simonsays1980 simonsays1980 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

}
# `.api_stack()`
self.api_stack(
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not self.enable_rl_module_and_learner = True?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is this weird logic about the hybrid API stack's exploration settings, requiring us to go through the actual method call. We can remove all this logic, once the hybrid API stack is deprecated (soon! :) ).

…ch_on_new_api_stack_by_default_for_sac_and_dqn
Signed-off-by: sven1977 <[email protected]>
@sven1977 sven1977 enabled auto-merge (squash) September 23, 2024 13:20
@github-actions github-actions bot added the go add ONLY when ready to merge, run all tests label Sep 23, 2024
@sven1977 sven1977 enabled auto-merge (squash) September 23, 2024 13:22
Signed-off-by: sven1977 <[email protected]>
…ch_on_new_api_stack_by_default_for_sac_and_dqn
Signed-off-by: sven1977 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: sven1977 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: sven1977 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: sven1977 <[email protected]>
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
go add ONLY when ready to merge, run all tests rllib RLlib related issues rllib-newstack rllib-oldstack-cleanup Issues related to cleaning up classes, utilities on the old API stack
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants