-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[RLlib; Offline RL] - Enable reading old-stack SampleBatch
data in new stack Offline RL.
#47359
Merged
sven1977
merged 8 commits into
ray-project:master
from
simonsays1980:offline-rl-add-option-to-read-sample-batch-data
Aug 29, 2024
+182
−13
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
15b3ea7
Started to write converter from old 'SampleBatch' to new 'Episodes' i…
simonsays1980 20c23f9
Merge branch 'master' into offline-rl-add-option-to-read-sample-batch…
simonsays1980 8e88c46
Added option to 'OfflinePreLearner' to convert old stack 'SampleBatch…
simonsays1980 1eca84b
Removed some relicts from earlier tryouts in 'OfflineData'.
simonsays1980 abcd066
CHanged some comment and added a missing apostrophe that was raising …
simonsays1980 54b4724
Added missing JSON file for testing conversion from 'SampleBatch' to …
simonsays1980 7afe903
Merge branch 'master' into offline-rl-add-option-to-read-sample-batch…
simonsays1980 edc5691
Added suggestions from @sven1977's review.
simonsays1980 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to be 100% safe, should we even allow NEXT_OBS to be present in
input_compress_columns
, then? If we ignore it anyways.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great question. Right now we "assume" only that a user will never put
Columns.NEXT_OBS
intoinput_compress_columns
AND and the same time NOTColumns.OBS
, but this could of course be different.My idea is also to ONLY ALLOW
Columns
constants ininput_compress_columns
b/c if different column names are used, the user has to nevertheless use a custominput_read_schema
that mapsColumns
constants to her custom column names.