-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Standardize how we fix serialization problems for Protobufs #29
Comments
Hi Pablo, Can you point out some of the places of using different serialization/deserialization ? |
Hi @iasoon , Just wanted to understand a bit more about the issue 🙂 It seems like there are some pros and cons with each serialization approach:
Curious for your opinion on keeping a mix of them or stick to one convention of using |
@rkenmi Personally, I definitely prefer the A while back, I took a stab at implementing this for all protobuf types we depend on: There is also this effort that would help us, but I don't know where that went. I definitely agree that having custom Hope that helps! Happy to discuss more. |
Nice, thanks for sharing the snippet! I'm not really sure of a good way either for propagating I did find this API which looks useful, but they recently marked it as deprecated due to reliability issues. |
I'm not sure either. Too bad that that API was deprecated! Maybe we can ask the ray team whether there is a recommended way to do this? I think technically we don't need it on any worker either, but only the ones that serialize protobuf messages. If my memory serves well, I think that's currently only the main task and the run_bundle tasks. |
From review:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: